Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Ugliness Problem- Is it irrational to discriminate against the appearance-challenged?
Forbes ^ | Dan Seligman

Posted on 08/04/2005 1:38:38 PM PDT by Asphalt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last
To: Asphalt
Irrational? Not at all.
Un-PC? definitely.

So we probably need a law againt it.

21 posted on 08/04/2005 1:45:23 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimWforBush

Unnngh


22 posted on 08/04/2005 1:45:23 PM PDT by Asphalt (Join my NFL ping list! FReepmail me| The best things in life aren't things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hadean
The appearance-challenged? What the heck does that even MEAN?!

Look in the mirror. Just kidding ;^)>

Like I'm one to talk...

23 posted on 08/04/2005 1:47:30 PM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt

LOL!!!




Perhaps I should take two pics of myself.. one with my military BC glasses on, and one with my regular frames..


24 posted on 08/04/2005 1:48:25 PM PDT by Darksheare ("Just because I have a paper heart, doesn't mean tearing it is okay." -The man with the candy face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt

Interesting study found that the closer a person's facial features matched this overlay graph, the more attractive they were perceived to be.

25 posted on 08/04/2005 1:49:10 PM PDT by martin_fierro (Buzzin' on Birfday Cake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt

If I continue to scroll down, will there be a picture of Helen Thomas? LOL


26 posted on 08/04/2005 1:49:15 PM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
Does anyone remember Kelly LeBrock's "Don't hate me because I'm beautiful" ads?


27 posted on 08/04/2005 1:49:43 PM PDT by najida (Today AC--- Now I'm living for ice cubes and a phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

I'll have to stick my BC glasses on to qualify, but...
*chuckle*


28 posted on 08/04/2005 1:49:49 PM PDT by Darksheare ("Just because I have a paper heart, doesn't mean tearing it is okay." -The man with the candy face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
"...Beauty is skin-deep but ugly is to the bone 8-)...." I say, I say the "JAWBONE" that is..... By the way, can I get an order of ribs???
29 posted on 08/04/2005 1:50:17 PM PDT by Hand em their arse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

LOL


30 posted on 08/04/2005 1:51:13 PM PDT by JimWforBush (Alcohol - For the best times you'll never remember)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: najida

Yeah, it was for shampoo wasn't it?


31 posted on 08/04/2005 1:51:36 PM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Oh yeah? Well...well...you're "comically-challenged"! So HA! (kidding)


Oh no. Now I'm "comically-challenged" too...


32 posted on 08/04/2005 1:51:44 PM PDT by Hadean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hand em their arse
Mommy, make it go away
33 posted on 08/04/2005 1:51:55 PM PDT by TheBigB (I would like to extend to you an invitation to the pants party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt
The family founders, in 18th-century Frankfurt, were supremely ugly, but several generations later, after successive marriages to supremely beautiful women, the men in the family were indistinguishable from movie stars.

This isn't exactly something that buttresses Seligman's already-fishy argument. There are a number of web sites (to say nothing of the supermarket tabloids like the Enquirer and Star) that routinely publish photos of movie and TV stars without the $1000 makeup jobs or professionally-Photoshopped pictures, and suffice it to say that a very large number of them are no more attractive in real life than anyone else you might pick randomly off the street ... and a sizable minority are downright unappealing.

34 posted on 08/04/2005 1:52:32 PM PDT by Dont Mention the War (John Bolton for White House Press Secretary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

Pantene I believe, but it was so funny like "well, I didn't hate you before, but now that I know you're VAIN I DO!"


35 posted on 08/04/2005 1:52:43 PM PDT by najida (Today AC--- Now I'm living for ice cubes and a phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

;^)>


36 posted on 08/04/2005 1:52:48 PM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Hey, dont feel bad. Someone told me that they put a pic of me in their basement and it solved their termite problem..........

ba-dum-bum


37 posted on 08/04/2005 1:52:57 PM PDT by day10 (Rules cannot substitute for character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Hey it is my week, you can't have it!!


38 posted on 08/04/2005 1:53:14 PM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt

"...New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, concludes that less attractive children are discriminated against by their own parents...."

Too many potential smart-aleky comments to choose from.


39 posted on 08/04/2005 1:53:41 PM PDT by mad puppy ( "He's with me!" And I'm with W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

ROFL!


40 posted on 08/04/2005 1:53:44 PM PDT by saveliberty (NYT= all that money and no class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson