Posted on 08/04/2005 2:28:25 PM PDT by Stephen Schwartz
Zawahiri's Threats Al Qaeda's number two man should be taken even more seriously than Osama bin Laden. by Stephen Schwartz 08/04/2005 4:00:00 PM
AYMAN AL-ZAWAHIRI, the second-in-command of Osama bin Laden, has delivered a video statement, broadcast by al Jazeera, threatening more terror by al Qaeda in Britain and in the United States. His rant must be taken extremely seriously.
First, while Osama bin Laden is a hateful, murderous Islamist radical, there is a difference in psychology between him and Zawahiri. Bin Laden falls into the category of those who became radicals to fill a void in their lives. The scion of a colossally rich family, bin Laden is said to have first arrived at the jihadist frontlines in Pakistan, decades ago, with the typical dress and manner of a cosmopolitan Saudi. His radicalism springs from resentment that the Saudi kingdom has strayed from the path of pure Wahhabism, the state religion.
Zawahiri is different. He was recruited to the Egyptian jihadist movement as a teenager, and his worldview has not changed since he became a young fanatic. In effect, he has never matured and never had a normal life, even though he was trained in medicine and has real standing as an Islamic scholar. Paradoxically, this contrasts with bin Laden, whose only professions have been those of playboy and terrorist.
But his Islamic studies give Zawahiri's statements more authority and credibility with young jihadist recruits, to whom the guidance of a Zawahiri surpasses that of a "media star" like Bin Laden.
Finally, the strain of Islamist extremism represented by Zawahiri, originating in Egypt with the Muslim Brotherhood or Ikhwan, has always been more vituperative in its view of the West than the straight Wahhabism of bin Laden. The Egyptians adopted the Wahhabi claims to represent the only genuine Sunni Muslims in the world, and their program for imposition of a strict Islamic state; but they also expressed a deeper hatred and contempt for Westerners based on their experience with British colonial rule. The same ideology marks the Pakistani Islamists off from the Saudis, who always accepted the need for alliances with the Christian powers in order to protect Wahhabi dominance in the Arabian peninsula (while they attacked Shia and other non-Wahhabi Muslims).
While it may seem counterintuitive, the new offensive of al Qaeda, represented by the two terror attacks in London and the Zawahiri declaration, may be expressions of weakness on the main front in Iraq. Iraqi Sunnis are turning away from Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and his murderous Wahhabi offensive. Shia and Kurdish authorities are consolidating. With the Iraq jihad in decline, al Qaeda needs to reassert its power by more bloodshed in Baghdad and new atrocities in London and other Western cities.
But when Zawahiri speaks, more than rhetoric is involved. Real dangers to public security cannot be denied. Now is the time for U.S. preemptive action at home, including monitoring of the ideological messages in Sunni mosques and stepped-up surveillance and arrest of known radical preachers on our soil.
Stephen Schwartz is a frequent contributor to The Weekly Standard.
My family and I will fly to New York for the weekend.
It might also help to take this war seriously and start securing our borders, rounding up Islamic aliens and start arresting those that are preaching jihad while hiding behind their "rights". Enough with the ACLU, leftists, traitorous democrats, MSM and Political Correctness. This is a war that can be won.
I think he literally promised 10K dead in Iraq in his address.
It serves them little to make such bold statements that they know cannot be delivered upon. Makes them look pretty weak.
All Moslem appologists of terror should be expelled from the US
Glassification.
Perhaps the following may show a better view as to who OBL fell in with. I realize the issue whether he should be considered a Sunni/Whahhabist or a Qutbee may not make a bit of difference to most, e.g. we want him to be atomized etc., for those that seek a somewhat deeper idea as who he got brainwashed by and why, the following may provide a better picture then what the author writes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahhabism
Clicking on the may hyperlinks moving upward and backward, to view a lot in this section on Sunni sects etc., may provide some with the desire for a better idea as to what makes some of them click etc., may be found here.
Huh?
and what does the ACLU do??
>>With the Iraq jihad in decline
Those "last throes" again?
It may be time to start dragging the liberal Durbin's, Schumer, and Kennedy's out of the Senate in handcuffs, and charge them with "treason!"
If you are against the United States, you are the ENEMY. All Americans need to take what ever action necessary to kill and defeat these terrorist, no matter where we find them, and no matter who they are!
Once again we see someone other than OBL.
I suggest we look into the friends, families and mosques of these people; http://insightmag.com/news/269873.html
We saw enough of UBL for over 55 minutes worth of video last October - (he is still very much alive).
Glassification of Mecca with a BIG HOT BOMB.
Glassification of Mecca with a BIG HOT BOMB.
And didn't he mention John Kerry by name when talking about the election? How could that be almost three years after Tora Bora? I think he is obviously still alive but I wonder just why Zawahiri is giving all the speeches. Could be simply that he's in a more secure location.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.