If the Constitution is a "living breathing document" why can't we consider Roe v. Wade being a "living breathing" decision?
Apparently the Constitution can only inhale, never exhale. (Or maybe it's the other way around.)
15 posted on 08/05/2005 1:19:17 PM PDT by Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)