Court rejects effort to block EPA rules on mercury pollution

AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 8/5/05 | John Heilprin - AP

[NormsRevenge]

WASHINGTON (AP) - An effort by environmental groups to block the Bush administration from implementing regulations on mercury pollution power plants was rejected by a federal appeals court.

Without comment, Judges David Sentelle and Janice Rogers Brown of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied a motion to halt immediately the regulations adopted in March by the Environmental Protection Agency.

The rules set a nationwide cap on mercury emissions from about 600 coal-burning power plants and puts a ceiling on allowable pollution for each state beginning in 2010. Individual plants, however, can avoid cleanups by buying pollution allowances from plants well under allowable limits.

Environmental and health advocacy groups plus 14 states have asked the appeals court to order EPA to rewrite the regulations to require that all plants install within the next three years the best available technology for cutting mercury pollution. In the meantime they asked the judges to set aside the regulations until the case can be heard.

Sentelle and Brown refused to do that in an order filed late Thursday.

"The court's denial in no way diminishes the strength of our appeal," said Peter Aseltine, a spokesman for the New Jersey attorney general's office. "We do expect to prevail on the merits."

Other states challenging EPA's rules are California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont and Wisconsin.

Advocacy groups Environmental Defense, National Wildlife Federation and the Sierra Club say EPA's regulations, written with the help of industry lobbyists, should force power plants to install technology to capture mercury emissions.

EPA officials maintain that the agency's approach will reduce mercury pollution from power plants in half by 2020, from 48 tons a year now to 24.3 tons, and eventually by 70 percent.

"Obviously, it's a big win for us and means we can proceed with our rule," said Jeff Holmstead, EPA's assistant administrator for air and radiation. "It's the first time any country has regulated mercury emissions from power plants."

EPA estimates 300,000 babies born each year may have more risk of learning disabilities because of mercury concentrations in the blood of their mothers from eating fish from all over the world.

"There's virtually no relationship between the number of children born with potentially elevated levels of mercury and U.S. power plants," Holmstead said. "It's only a very, very small number of people who are affected by local mercury depositions."

[SmithL]

and Janice Rogers Brown of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

That sure has a nice ring to it!

How about Chief Justice of the United State Supreme Court Janice Rogers Brown?

[B4Ranch]

>>EPA estimates 300,000 babies born each year may have more risk of learning disabilities because of mercury concentrations in the blood of their mothers from eating fish from all over the world.<<

world population is 6,446,131,400

300,000 babies born each year may have more risk of learning disabilities

Or the parents could be idiots to start with.

Or their teachers may not be qualified.

Or ............

Or ............

Or ............