"Obviously it was wrong to murder Terri. If you really believed it was right, you wouldn't have to start your post with a proven lie to justify her murder."
The point I was making is: Randall Terry is a scumbag, and does much to discredit any cause, to which he associates himself.
I understood your point. What I don't understand is how you justify your position. How does your hatred of a man promoting Christianity justify murdering disabled people? And if you really believe it's justified, why do you have to use lies in an attempt to convince others?