Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should Conservatives Give The New York Times a Break?
Townhall.com ^ | 8/6/05 | Mark Tapscott

Posted on 08/06/2005 2:11:28 PM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 last
To: CFC__VRWC
I notice that a month later there's been not a single letter typeset in the Ol' Gray Whore about AAR stealing from little "inner city" kids and alzhimers patients.

The problem isn't going to be cured by a memo.

Most of the people on the news/editorial staff were chosen BECAUSE of their Liberal biases. Asking a Liberal to be less liberal is like asking a pit bull to be less canine.

Fire em and start again or shaddup already!

121 posted on 08/06/2005 9:07:01 PM PDT by America's Resolve (Liberal Democrats are liars, cheats and thieves with no morals, scruples, ethics or honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

"The NYT is liberal because the Sulzberger family which OWNS the NTY is. It will continue to be so, until the publisher "Pinch" Sulzberger changes his views.
"

When you are vey wealthy and having a failed business, you use it as a write off. If the NY Slimes just reported just the facts and left out the commentators opinions(they are not articles, they are left wing opinion pieces), then maybe the readership will go up and they will begin to make money.

Wow, what a concept. Telling the truth and gettig paid for it.


122 posted on 08/07/2005 6:20:24 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

No.


123 posted on 08/07/2005 8:54:51 AM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demkicker
I live in the Portland, Oregon area and have been barraged with calls from the NYT over the past two weeks to become a subscriber.

I finally answered one and told the poor lady selling this pathetic rag that I will never again believe a word the NYT writes following their "missing weapons" collaboration with John Kerry the week before the election.
124 posted on 08/07/2005 8:00:41 PM PDT by Carling (http://www.marriedadults.com/howarddeanscreamaudio141jq.mp3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: seamole
I'm not even sure if Brooks is pro-life or not, but the column was superbly placed and timed.

I remember that column, and the core argument (IIRC) - that the Court never should've removed abortion from state legislatures - was certainly an interesting and provocative one. But there is still a large constituency of social conservatives who are a big part of the American right and, to many NYT readers, are a bunch of 19th-century knuckle-draggers. To acknowledge the strength of their agenda would, I think, be too uncomfortable for NYT opinion manufacturers.

125 posted on 08/08/2005 6:46:13 AM PDT by untenured (http://futureuncertain.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Let's also keep in mind that bias as often means what is NOT said as well as what is said.


126 posted on 08/08/2005 6:49:13 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson