Posted on 08/06/2005 7:56:00 PM PDT by Crackingham
The Justice Department refused yesterday to turn over documents about Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts Jr. that Senate Democrats have demanded, escalating the most serious conflict in a confirmation process that has been more placid than either side had predicted.
The attorney general's office said in four-page letters to each of the eight Democrats on the Judiciary Committee that it is "simply contrary to the public interest" to release certain records from Roberts's service in the solicitor general's office, which argues cases before the Supreme Court on behalf of the executive branch.
"For the Solicitor General's office to perform its public service effectively, the internal deliberations of the office must remain confidential," each letter said. It added that "the public interest in the office's zealous representation of the interests of the United States would be compromised by a breach of that confidentiality."
Democrats reacted angrily, accusing President Bush and his subordinates of "stonewalling" legitimate demands for information that would help them understand the nominee's legal philosophy. But they acknowledged that they see no immediate avenue of appeal, even as they vowed to find other ways to illuminate Roberts's tenure at the Justice Department from 1989 to 1993.
SNIP
Roberts has said his personal views cannot fairly be inferred from a position he argued on behalf of an administration. This prodded Democrats to seek documents that might have revealed his opinions about the positions he took in internal deliberations about the merits of different arguments, and whether the government should intervene.
Strategists in both parties predicted that Democrats now will try to make the documents a central issue in the Judiciary Committee's televised confirmation hearings for Roberts, which are scheduled to begin Sept. 6, the day after Labor Day.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
These scum have no shame. And I don't toss the term "slime" around lightly.
Democrat eight:
Patrick J. Leahy
RANKING DEMOCRATIC MEMBER, VERMONT
Edward M. Kennedy
MASSACHUSETTS
Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
DELAWARE
Herbert Kohl
WISCONSIN
Dianne Feinstein
CALIFORNIA
Russell D. Feingold
WISCONSIN
Charles E. Schumer
NEW YORK
Richard J. Durbin
ILLINOIS
Oh no! Now the Democrats are going to become angry and uncooperative. [wringing hands]
Justice Dept. Balks ...
Balk my eye. It sounds like they threw them a bean ball and told them to stuff it...
just following the script
Edward M. Kennedy = Murderer
Patrick J. Leahy = Leaker
Richard J. Durbin = Traitor
Very nice. I wouldn't give these swine anything but a boot.
LOL ... It is pathetic to think this miscreants are on the JUDICIARY committee. I was getting nauseous and had to stop. Thanks for continuing.
Democrat eight:
Patrick J. Leahy
RANKING DEMOCRATIC MEMBER, VERMONT
Edward M. Kennedy
MASSACHUSETTS
Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
DELAWARE
Herbert Kohl
WISCONSIN
Dianne Feinstein
CALIFORNIA
Russell D. Feingold
WISCONSIN
Charles E. Schumer
NEW YORK
Richard J. Durbin
ILLINOIS
Your "Agonizers", Please!
Seeing that list makes me think of "The Seven Deadly Sins" Plus one.
Jack.
...make the documents a central issue in the ...televised confirmation hearing.....
Argggghhh!
Come on...THIS ISN'T EVEN NEWS! The whole TV audience will be put to sleep by the Dims stuttering and stammering over this.
Speaking of news, where's the front page stuff on the Wilson-Plame leak deal? Ha! Yeah....FIRE ROVE! 8-O
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.