Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Truthsayer20
This is example of a situation where "deregulation" actually decreases competition among service providers.
A woman went into a butcher shop and asked the price for chicken. The butcher replied, "Two dollars a pound." The woman replied, "That's outrageous - down the block the price is only $1.50 a pound!"

The butcher replied, "Then I guess you'll be buying your chicken there." The woman replied, "They don't have any chicken, though." The butcher replied, "Oh, that's different - when we don't have any chicken, we only charge $1.00 a pound!"

There is only one legitimate way of driving down the price of a good - and that is to increase the supply of it. I fail to see how reducing the profitability of increasing the supply of anything is going to cause its supply to increase.

These "competitors" to whom the actual wirestringers like Verizon have been required to sell at a deep discount have the primary effect of reducing the profit of the telecoms attributable to DSL. If you buy DSL from a third party instead of Vorizon, Vorizon does all the work but gets less money for it than if you paid the same money to Verizon directly.

Maybe a given DSL line would be put in at the discounted price anyway - but also, maybe it wouldn't. It doesn't matter how low the price is if there is nothing on the shelf to buy.


16 posted on 08/07/2005 5:04:00 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson