[SiliconValleyGuy]

Let's pray Farah and the skeptics like Ann are wrong about him.

I heard Coulter interviewed on Hannity a couple days ago. She was ranting about how Roberts has no paper trail, and going on and on about Souter's betrayal, suggesting that Roberts could follow suit. When Hannity asked her whether she had read the (apparently lengthy and very specific) answers he had written to the committee's questions, she hadn't. So how can she pass herself off as an expert on Roberts's credentials?

[Congressman Billybob]

Silicon,

Thanks for catching that appearance of Coulter on Hannity's show, which demonstrates what I said from the beginning about Coulter. Normally she does excellent research. But in this case, for whatever reason, she did a sloppy job and has produced back-of-the=envelope columns as a result.

John / Billybob

[alnick]

When Hannity asked her [Coulter] whether she had read the (apparently lengthy and very specific) answers he had written to the committee's questions, she hadn't.

Coulter has gone out on a limb for her contrarian position. Informing herself would put that position in jeopardy.

I generally like Ann, but she is allowing her pride to cloud her judgment on this.