Posted on 08/09/2005 9:09:21 AM PDT by Crackingham
Will THESE help any??
In trinary; 2+2=11
Like them poisonus fish that them loco Japanese eat!
It only works if prepared right!
How did THIS evolve???
Offshoot of Tennesee snake-handlers??
All you reptiles tend to stick together!
But grasshoppers are, go figure.
INTREP
Thankssssss. :D
Yeah...think Mutual protection, (Its' a hard life, defending onesssself...after being called Liberal/Sssshrillary/Bubba...."That Insert name here , is a ssssnake/reptile." :) We have pride/sssself-image, too.
Are you suggesting that the evidence extant in God's creation supports a 6,000 year old earth and Noachian biological seeding of the entire planet? Or perhaps you are suggesting that God was being coy in those verses, and actually planted a lot of false evidence on the earth and in the universe to trick us into, what, hell?
Only 2 choices?
Romans 1:20
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
It says nothing about HOW God made His creation; merely that He did...
Proverbs 25:2
It is the glory of God to conceal a matter; to search out a matter is the glory of kings.
I'll be happy to assert that. Let's start with Argon dating on rocks. The amout of argon present in newly formed rock in Hawaii and Washington is about the same as in rocks dated from 350 million to 500 million years, so the dating methods are false. The psuedo-science crowd simply says that the method only works on old rock, without providing any reasonable hypothesis upon which to rest. The only reason to stretch the time line is to allow for the statistical impossibility of evolution.
The japanese are doing it wrong..they should eat the blowfish raw,thus building up an immunity to the poison through evolution.Someday they will be able to eat blowfish without fear of poisoning..but the drawback is that the japanese will then be inedible but we will have fair warning because they will have developed distinct warning colors.
Your comment: "Let's start with Argon dating on rocks. The amout of argon present in newly formed rock in Hawaii and Washington is about the same as in rocks dated from 350 million to 500 million years, so the dating methods are false. The psuedo-science crowd simply says that the method only works on old rock, without providing any reasonable hypothesis upon which to rest."
________________________________________________________
Militant hogwash.
On radiometric dating, you begin educating yourself here:
http://geoweb.tamu.edu/courses/geol101/grossman/Absolute.time.pp.html
http://www.gpc.edu/~pgore/geology/geo102/radio.htm
http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/contents.html
and http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/radiometric.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/isochron-dating.html
For a Christian perspective on radiometric dating, you can read the following:
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/Wiens.html
On radiocarbon dating, you begin your education here:
http://www.c14dating.com/
http://www.nhm-wien.ac.at/NHM/Prehist/Stadler/14C_Project/
And continue your education by keeping with articles published here:
http://www.radiocarbon.org/
Furthermore, the problems with a young earth only start with materials-dating. You have pesky problems, to put it mildly, with pretty much the balance of the known universe.
_______________________________________________________
Your additional comment: "The only reason to stretch the time line is to allow for the statistical impossibility of evolution."
________________________________________________________
What "statistical impossibility of evolution"? And do you suppose that geologists, astronomers, physicists, chemists, etc. are being paid off by the evil, global cabal of heathen biology professors in order to prop up the theory of evolution? (I know, I know, those wierdo, drug-taking, hedonistic, sex-crazed biology profs only want the theory of evolution to be true so that they can carry on with their midnight orgies.)
Indeed. And neither does Genesis. Now, where do we start looking for the "how"? And if we look for the "how" in the physical evidence of His creation, what does that physical evidence tell us?
When .38 revolvers are outlawed, only frogs will have .38 revolvers!
CA....
You have big problems! And you want to 'educate' me? Thanks for the laugh.
What "big problems"? Or is this just more cryptic hogwash from the conspiracy set?
I don't see how you can see a 'conspiracy' in spiritual blindness. It's the desire for God's word to be wrong that drives evolunacy. Just reading Stephen Gould's Wonderful Life makes that really clear.
Nicotine is very toxic. Tobacco doesn't really have very much.
Let's see a reference, please.
The data I've seen on Hawaiian basalt has given ages of the order of 1 - 2 million years, or within statistical variation of zero.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.