Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Justice Says He's Worried About Political Criticism
AP ^ | 8/9/05 | Gina Holland

Posted on 08/09/2005 1:38:59 PM PDT by Crackingham

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said Tuesday that rulings on difficult subjects like gay rights and the death penalty have left courts vulnerable to political attacks that are threatening judicial independence. Breyer urged lawyers to help educate people about court responsibility to be an independent decision-maker.

"If you say seven or eight or nine members of the Supreme Court feel there's a problem ... you're right," he told the American Bar Association. "It's this edge on a lot of issues."

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who was speaking with Breyer, said: "The politics of judges is getting to be red hot." He said Supreme Court rulings on the Pledge of Allegiance and Ten Commandments have captured the public's interest and polarized Democrats and Republicans.

"There's nothing that's not on the table," former Solicitor General Theodore Olson said of the court's work, which this fall includes issues like abortion, capital punishment and assisted suicide.

Breyer said the nine-member court is focused on constitutional limits on major fights of the day. "We're sort of at the outer bounds. And we can't control politics of it, and I don't think you want us to try to control politics of it," he said.

Congressional leaders including House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, have criticized justices in recent months. DeLay was particularly critical of the court's refusal to stop Terri Schiavo's death and at a death penalty decision that cited international cases.

Breyer defended using overseas legal opinions as a guide only, adding, "It has hit a political nerve."

Breyer, Olson and Graham were discussing the future of courts on the final day of the ABA's annual meeting in Chicago. Also Tuesday, the group was debating whether to endorse federal protection for journalists who refuse to reveal their sources to prosecutors. Passage of such a measure would authorize the organization to lobby Congress, where "shield law" proposals are pending.

Judicial independence has been a major theme at the meeting of the ABA, a 400,000-member group. The group's policymaking board passed a resolution urging elected officials and others to support and defend judges. New group President Michael Greco of Boston said judges have faced physical threats, and threats of impeachment from Washington political leaders unhappy with court decisions.

"If we do not protect our courts, our courts cannot protect us," Greco said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: scotus; stephenbreyer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Crackingham

Ya can't make this dung up BUMP!!


61 posted on 08/09/2005 3:07:26 PM PDT by conservativecorner (It's a cult of death and submission to fanatics Larry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Maybe instead of ruling based on a desire to be accepted by Eastern liberal intelligensia, he is starting to worry about being accepted by those who value the Constitution.


62 posted on 08/09/2005 3:08:28 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
"Judaical" Activism?



Too Hebrew.

63 posted on 08/09/2005 3:14:20 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Breyer said the nine-member court is focused on constitutional limits on major fights of the day. "We're sort of at the outer bounds. And we can't control politics of it, and I don't think you want us to try to control politics of it," he said.

Which is why you approved CFR?

64 posted on 08/09/2005 3:18:23 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Breyer get your head out of your a#@.


65 posted on 08/09/2005 3:19:57 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
"rulings on difficult subjects like gay rights and the death penalty have left courts vulnerable to political attacks that are threatening judicial independence."

What about "Eminent Domain", Stephen??? (Are you paying attention, Justice Souter???) Maybe a little political--and economic--pressure on Supreme Court Justices is not such a bad thing, huh???

66 posted on 08/09/2005 3:35:25 PM PDT by Savage Beast (Love is the ultimate aphrodisiac!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
It is hard to understand how you have a better knowledge of our gooberment than our weeny supremes do.
67 posted on 08/09/2005 3:36:08 PM PDT by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Look like the Marxists in black robes are getting a bit crispy around the edges from all the fire they're taking.


68 posted on 08/09/2005 3:37:59 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Member of Arbor Day Foundation, travelling the country and destroying open space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Absolutely no mention of the Kelo decision on eminent domain.


69 posted on 08/09/2005 3:38:39 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said Tuesday that rulings on difficult subjects like gay rights and the death penalty have left courts vulnerable to political attacks that are threatening judicial independence. Breyer urged lawyers to help educate people about court responsibility to be an independent decision-maker

There would be no problem if they stuck to the wording and original meaning of the Constitution, the U.S. Constitution that is.

70 posted on 08/09/2005 3:52:23 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnstone
SOLUTION: Interpret enforce the constitution. It needs very little "interpretation". At most it needs a little research into terminology as used in the late 1700s, or a bit of research into the debates surrounding the passage of various later amendments. This to define what the authors of the words meant by them.
71 posted on 08/09/2005 3:57:21 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
He should have stuck to making the flavourless imitation of Dreyer's ice cream.


72 posted on 08/09/2005 4:00:53 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne
Threatening judicial activism! That's what Breyer is worried about.

Indeed, far too many Judges and Justices have become the "domestic enemies" of the Constitution that many of us swore to defend it against, as did they.

73 posted on 08/09/2005 4:01:03 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Judicial independence as though they should never be bothered by the real-world effects of their asinine rulings is something that shouldn't exist.

I wish the founders had included term or gov't service limits such that no one could spend his whole life in the gov't. And they ought to have fixed the terms of judges at a lengthy but ,finite, term,say, 14 years in office then back to the real world.

74 posted on 08/09/2005 4:02:24 PM PDT by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.


75 posted on 08/09/2005 4:02:33 PM PDT by BlessedBeGod (Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Ping for later read.


76 posted on 08/09/2005 4:02:45 PM PDT by planekT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
Maybe the threat of impeachment is hitting a bit too close to home?

Impeachment is the only peaceable arrow in the quiver against these folks. The problem is, the ones who would have to conduct such proceedings, and even more so the ones who would then conduct the removal trials, are often as not, the beneficiaries of the un and extra constitutional decisions of The Court.

77 posted on 08/09/2005 4:03:37 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
78 posted on 08/09/2005 4:03:46 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

awwwwww....


79 posted on 08/09/2005 4:05:19 PM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< OurFlorida.true.ws Impeach Judge Greer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk
You're right. Breyer is a POS. This statement of his is evidence alone that he's unqualified to serve or understands the magnitude of his appointment.

Breyer, you're a tool. Resign.

80 posted on 08/09/2005 4:07:18 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson