The Hildabeast must be defeated even by a liberal, if that's what it takes, because of the threat she poses to becoming President.
Whatever, whoever it takes, even someone to the left of her if necessary. This isn't very complicated.
Pirro can be Hillary. Spencer cannot.
Pirro can beat Hillary, I meant to say.
Interesting freudian slip there. I think she can be another Hillary too. ;-)
Anyway, you Pirro kool-aid drinkers can repeat "pirro can beat hillary" until you're blue in the face, but since you don't have ONE shread of evidence to prove your point, we have no reason to throw a great conservative overboard in favor of hilliary lite.
I have no problem admitting it when a "moderate" has a good shot at winning. Congresswoman Capito CAN beat KKK Byrd because the numbers and the money and the support ARE there. You can dream all you want that sime obscure RINO D.A. will come out of nowhere and "beat Hillary", that won't make it happen. Right now, Pirro would be lucky to break 35% against Hilderbeast, and her "credentials" pales compared to a decorated vietnam war ver who was twice elected mayor of the 4th largest city in New York.
"Pirro can beat hillary" is NOTHING more than wishful thinking on you part. I will not lynch a great consevative in the primary on such a premise. Might as well sell arms to Monaco on the off-chance they will "beat France" in a war.