Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jveritas

Hmmm.....I don't worry about what is "safe" to post here. I just post my heartfelt opinions.

If you have to think about what is "safe" that makes me wonder about you and your agenda.

Curious.



61 posted on 08/10/2005 10:07:20 PM PDT by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Shortstop7

I think you misunderstood my post. I was telling Normsrevenge that the safest way for anti-Bush anti-GOP posters is to post doom and gloom posts about the GOP and President Bush as indirect way of attacking President Bush and the GOP but this way they do have a great chance of not being banned.


66 posted on 08/10/2005 10:11:41 PM PDT by jveritas (The left cannot win a national election ever again and never will the Buchananites and 3rd parties)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Shortstop7

If you have to think about what is "safe" that makes me wonder about you and your agenda.

-------

Good point, those who put their blind faith in an agenda before their 'heartfelt' opinon are the real losers here, imo.

If you're a fake it shows anyway, eventually.

Some here like claiming the moral high ground and never consider that it also makes them easier targets as well as they proclaim that any protest, whether justified/ warranted or not, is treasonous or not in lockstep with the party line.

Now , is that any way to run a party?


80 posted on 08/10/2005 10:36:00 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Shortstop7; Stellar Dendrite; Psion; bayourod; jveritas

There is an enormous amount of money behind the agenda of essentially merging America into Mexico.

So naturally their shills will be here trying to shout down patriotic Americans. Characters like bayourod, for instance.


160 posted on 08/11/2005 7:38:19 AM PDT by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Shortstop7

I agree with you wholeheartedly. The Bushbots on this thread sound like Democrats with their sharpened fangs defending Clinton in byegone days.

Establishment Republicans are an arrogant bunch, which is the point the writer of this piece makes. This is what happens when "conservative" becomes subservient to "Republican."

I can't tell a bit of difference between the hysterical left and these name calling "GOP at any price" people. If you disagree with them they snarl and squeal. They have nothing left but insults. I realize I'm using some hyperbole here, but anybody that's tried to have a discussion on this thread gets mischaracterized as a "tinfoil hatter," etc...These are arrogant and rude people, the exact opposite of Ronald Reagan.

Let's see. They don't need the libertarians. They only need their kind of Christians. They don't need the people concerned with open borders. They don't need the populists. What a party. They seem ready to drink their kool-aid and follow McCain off a cliff. Anything to keep power, even if that power does the work of the opposing party.

Some of us don't like becoming a Spanish speaking nation ruled by black robed judges. Some of us don't like political correctness and thought control. Some of us don't like gas prices going up a nickel a week. And they tell us we can't discuss it here, among our own people WITHOUT BEING INSULTED.

We are going to take a bath next year, people. Call me gloom and doom, but offering a program of high gas prices, trade agreements, open borders, and a war with no conclusion in sight is not a platform for victory. Flame away, Bushbots. I could care less.


431 posted on 08/13/2005 9:36:45 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson