[Clint Williams]

If the state can tell you what you can't say, they can tell you what you must say.

Then by extension are we setting a bad precedent here? (I know, that would be a slippery slope, but that's not to say that slippery slopes / camel's noses don't exist.)

[Old Professer]

SCOTUS threw this back into the state's laps; probably will resurface.

The ruling that says "one nation under god" is not separation comes closer to the subject under review here.

Better if we were to avoid ritual at all levels in social settings.

Ordinary discourse was the original focus of the 1st, not careering blabbermouths in the populated agoura.

Life doesn't come with an instruction manual.