Skip to comments.
Justice Breyer: 'Not all
our decisions are right'
WorldNetDaily ^
| August 11, 2005
| Joe Kovacs
Posted on 08/11/2005 12:31:49 PM PDT by Past Your Eyes
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer says not all rulings from America's highest court are correct, admitting judges don't have "some great special insight," and he defends the practice of studying courts in foreign countries to help decide cases in the United States.
Breyer made the remarks during a panel discussion this week in Chicago at the annual conference of the American Bar Association.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blackrobedtyrants; scotus; stephenbreyer; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
During the conference, Breyer also defended the increasing practice of the U.S. Supreme Court examining laws and rulings in foreign nations to help come to conclusions here ----
What a maroon. O'Connor, too.
To: Past Your Eyes
He's right about that. Unfortunately, he has a distorted view of which ones are wrong.
2
posted on
08/11/2005 12:34:00 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: Past Your Eyes
I saw a C-span show where Scalia and Breyer discussed issues and took questions from the audience. Scalia took him apart and was clearly enjoying twisting him into a pretzel with his own logic. The crowd was also trying to trap Scalia and he would have none of that either.
Breyer is a pussy, IMHO.
3
posted on
08/11/2005 12:34:34 PM PDT
by
Thebaddog
(How's yer dawgs?)
To: Brilliant
Notice that was conveniently left out of the discussion. Maybe he should check with Scalia to find out which ones need to be corrected.
4
posted on
08/11/2005 12:35:05 PM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: All
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer says not all rulings from America's highest court are correctOoh, lemme guess. Would the incorrect rulings be the ones where he's in the minority?
5
posted on
08/11/2005 12:36:41 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
(99.44000000% sarcasm-free.)
To: Past Your Eyes
No shit Sherlock Breyer, and HELL NO to foreign laws. I don't live in a country named "Foreign". I live in the United States of America, and our laws are derived from our Constitution, or at least that should be what is occurring. Said to say that currently it is not.
6
posted on
08/11/2005 12:37:15 PM PDT
by
conservativecorner
(It's a cult of death and submission to fanatics Larry!!)
To: Past Your Eyes
he defends the practice of studying courts in foreign countries to help decide cases in the United States.
Globalists love that kind of talk....
7
posted on
08/11/2005 12:39:14 PM PDT
by
lewislynn
(Status quo today is the result of eliminating the previous status quo. Be careful what you wish for)
To: Thebaddog
I saw a C-span show where Scalia and Breyer discussed issues and took questions from the audience. Scalia took him apart and was clearly enjoying twisting him into a pretzel with his own logic. The crowd was also trying to trap Scalia and he would have none of that either.
Breyer is a pussy, IMHO.
I saw them on C-span too, maybe it was the same program. I agree with your opinion of Breyer. He looks like a homosexual pedophile to me. With his delicate little limp hands and sleepy looking eyes he has "pervert" written all over him.
8
posted on
08/11/2005 12:39:42 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
To: Thebaddog
I saw that on Cspan too. Breyer was telling some teary-eyed tale of walking up a hill and seeing some wall that used to be a jail and is now the wall of the courtroom and he was really moved. I was thinking "and this has to do with American Constitutional law how???"
It's all emotions with these people. Result-oriented decisions.
To: Past Your Eyes
I can't believe that they spent half that article defending looking to foreign courts for our laws. Its insanity!
10
posted on
08/11/2005 12:42:26 PM PDT
by
Personal Responsibility
(Register to vote as a Dem! You get to vote in their primaries and it screws up their polling data!)
To: Jaysun
11
posted on
08/11/2005 12:43:33 PM PDT
by
hang 'em
(Here Lies Peter Jennings - Deported with Extreme Prejudice.)
To: lewislynn
Well a lot of foreign nations have built their judiciaries to mimic the American one. But they were established later, so they may take into account more contemporary social phenomenon.
It kind of reminds me of animation. America popularizes it, Japan "tweaks" it, and now American animators are studying Japanese animation just like the Japanese originally studied ours. Its still a product of the evolution of American animation, even if some modifications were first made in other countries.
I also agree that Breyer would probably be studying the wrong countries.
To: Past Your Eyes
someone needs to remind these people what their job description is---the interpretation of U.S. laws and the U.S. Constitution as applied to decisions of U.S. courts
To: Personal Responsibility
Justice Ginsberg has also advocated using international and foreign law in making opinions for Americans!!!
THEY all need to go that have that opinion, IMHO!
14
posted on
08/11/2005 12:45:46 PM PDT
by
Txsleuth
(Free Republic is #1!!!!!)
To: Past Your Eyes
If he's so found of european justice, perhaps he should resign his seat and apply for one in europe. In case he didn't notice it, he's a member of the UNITED STATES Supreme Court, not the International Court.
15
posted on
08/11/2005 12:45:46 PM PDT
by
McGavin999
("You must call evil by it's name" GW Bush ......... It's name is Terror)
To: Past Your Eyes
16
posted on
08/11/2005 12:46:20 PM PDT
by
Deo et Patria
(Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.)
To: Thebaddog
I saw that show as well. I was overwhelmigly impressed with Judge Scalia. I had never seen him in that type of setting. His insight and intelligence were boundless.
It created a feeling of embarassment in me to think he had to sit before a bunch of ass bags like Schumer for confirmation.
17
posted on
08/11/2005 12:47:32 PM PDT
by
IamConservative
(The true character of a man is revealed in what he does when no one is looking.)
To: Txsleuth
I think O'Conner and Kennedy subscribe to this idea also.
18
posted on
08/11/2005 12:47:42 PM PDT
by
bigsigh
To: Past Your Eyes
In the words of leading Democratic thinker Nancy Pelosi, "It is a decision of the Supreme Court -- so this is almost as if God has spoken."
19
posted on
08/11/2005 12:48:33 PM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(Lonesome's First Law: Whenever anyone says it's not about the money, it's about the money.)
To: kaotic133
Their job/obligation is to interpret OUR laws not Scottish law...and it's only relationship to animation is how phoney it's all become....
20
posted on
08/11/2005 12:51:13 PM PDT
by
lewislynn
(Status quo today is the result of eliminating the previous status quo. Be careful what you wish for)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson