Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The best summary I've read yet about this massive coverup. Anyone doubt what Sandy berger was trying to shove down his pants now?
1 posted on 08/11/2005 5:57:46 PM PDT by TonyInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: TonyInOhio; Peach; sheik yerbouty; NormsRevenge; Travis McGee; writer33; TAquinas; montag813
I'm sure I havent been the first to say it but....

This is HUGH and SERIES!!!!!!!


2 posted on 08/11/2005 6:00:22 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (The meaning of "peace" is the absence of opposition to socialism -- Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio; rintense; MJY1288; RedBloodedAmerican; twyn1; kitkat; justshe; ladyinred; lonestar; ...
And why is that significant? Because debunking the Atta-Iraq connection was of vital importance to Democrats, who had become focused almost obsessively on the preposterous notion that there was no relation whatever between Al Qaeda and Iraq -- that Al Qaeda and Iraq might even have been enemies.

PING

3 posted on 08/11/2005 6:01:18 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

Yes, Let's hear all about how Sandy Berger ties into this whole mess and DELIBERATELY STOLE NATIONAL ARCHIVE FILES...He and Jamie Gorelick ought to both be hauled into court and sued by Joe American!


4 posted on 08/11/2005 6:01:26 PM PDT by princess leah (\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio
Anyone doubt what Sandy berger was trying to shove down his pants now?

Clinton screwed up BAD!!! I really, really hope the right wing pundits spend a lot of time on this. It explains a lot!

5 posted on 08/11/2005 6:01:28 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

"And why is that significant? Because debunking the Atta-Iraq connection was of vital importance to Democrats, who had become focused almost obsessively on the preposterous notion that there was no relation whatever between Al Qaeda and Iraq -- that Al Qaeda and Iraq might even have been enemies."

This is explosive! Can we get the media off Natalie and all the other BS?v This is important!


6 posted on 08/11/2005 6:01:53 PM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

Got a link to the AP story? I can't find it.


7 posted on 08/11/2005 6:02:11 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

Why did this hit so big now? We were discussing it here during the commission hearings. Did some MSM have a slow news day?


8 posted on 08/11/2005 6:02:16 PM PDT by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

Send Gorelick to Gitmo!!!!!!


9 posted on 08/11/2005 6:02:20 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (The meaning of "peace" is the absence of opposition to socialism -- Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

How much coverage is this getting with most of the media, or need I even ask?!


10 posted on 08/11/2005 6:02:21 PM PDT by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio
So was the staff a) protecting the Atta timeline or b) Jamie Gorelick or c) the Clinton administration or d) itself, because it got hold of the information relatively late and the staff was lazy?

CAN YOU SAY CHINA GATE??

12 posted on 08/11/2005 6:03:06 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

If I had a nickel, hell, even a penny, for those of us who thought of Sandy Berger immediately, I would never have to work the rest of my life.


13 posted on 08/11/2005 6:03:21 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

Abledangergate?


15 posted on 08/11/2005 6:03:46 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Free Michael Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio
Shades of the Single Bullet theory and the Warren Commission. :-o

FR Archives Search Results.. Sandy Berger and SoxGate

16 posted on 08/11/2005 6:04:11 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

The manner in which the left is trying to play down and write off the AD story tells me there is really something here. Someting very bad for the Clinton administration.


18 posted on 08/11/2005 6:04:57 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (Recall Barbara Boxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio; Peach
????....THE 9/11 COMMISSION IN MORTAL DANGER ....????

Whoooaaah

????....stay out of Ft. ______ Park?

19 posted on 08/11/2005 6:05:03 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

20 posted on 08/11/2005 6:05:09 PM PDT by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

http://www.9-11commission.gov/about/bio_gorelick.htm


22 posted on 08/11/2005 6:05:46 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

"Because the Mohammed Atta timeline established by the Commission pointedly insisted Atta did not meet with an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague."

But that did not happen in 1999. It happened, supposedly, in 2001.

The visit to Prague may have been a misidentification. what makes it interesting now is how the Commission's final report, and leaks before it, tried to demean the identification by using...a timeline. Interestingly, the Prague sighting occured during a records-gap of about a week of Atta's travels inside America. The commission essentially ruled since there was no evidence Atta left in that period, he couldn't have left. Very weak. Now we have another dispute about a timeline.

"Anyone doubt what Sandy berger was trying to shove down his pants now?"

Yes. He could have been stealing any number of documents showing his negligence, in hind sight. He wouldn't have been told about a specific Able Danger sighting, so I doubt his conduct has anything to do with that.


24 posted on 08/11/2005 6:05:56 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio

Biggest story of the year! Also, what exactly did Sandy Burglar's antics (stolen docs) have to do with this story as well? Hmmmmm?????


25 posted on 08/11/2005 6:06:14 PM PDT by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyInOhio
So was the staff a) protecting the Atta timeline or b) Jamie Gorelick or c) the Clinton administration or d) itself, because it got hold of the information relatively late and the staff was lazy?

or e) protect Sandy Berger so we don't find out what he was stuffing down his pants or f) all of the above

27 posted on 08/11/2005 6:07:04 PM PDT by sydbas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson