"Because the Mohammed Atta timeline established by the Commission pointedly insisted Atta did not meet with an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague."
How could they establish he wasn't there? What was their evidence? Particularly since the Czech government insists he was in Prague. There's little chance of mistaking a face like Atta's.
This debate concerning whether Atta was in Prague has gone on for a long time, and I'm tired of it. Either show me that Atta was somewhere else, or except the possibility that he was in Prague on that date.
"The commission staff dismissed that report, saying a bank video camera in Florida pictured Atta withdrawing money five days prior to the supposed meeting in Czech Republic, and that records show Atta's cell phone was in use in Florida on the very date that Czech intelligence put him in Prague. "We do not believe that such a meeting occurred," the staff said."
http://www.factcheck.org/article203.html