Posted on 08/13/2005 5:53:03 AM PDT by Mia T
It still hasn't. It goes all around, but never here. I'm losing it.
So sorry:(
It hasn't rained here, either. It's a veritable steambath. The laws of probability and meteorology can't be defied too much longer. Hang in there. :)
Tell me, what is your, and your friends', opinion of www.rushlimbaugh.com?
THE MACRO RATIONALE: It is my view that merely to type out and post an essay as one would for print media misses much of this medium's potential. My objective was to combine written with graphic commentary. The graphics took various forms but evolved into what I call my virtual characters, 3-D models with lip-syncing and flash animation using the politico's own words, own audio. THE STYLE: Creating 3-D models with lip-syncing and animation is not like picking up a brush or pen. There are software and hardware constraints that limit the output... I have been experimenting with the medium for a couple of years; I believe my later work, e.g., the Jeanine Pirro character, is better technically and aesthetically (this irrespective of Jeanine's beauty). (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) THE VIRTUAL HILLARY RATIONALE : My initial objective was to document, expose and indict the clintons with their own words and deeds. My first character was virtual hillary.
THE DOCUMENTING: If you play NANO-PRESIDENT to the end, it will link to hillary talks: on terror, which contains excerpts of the C-SPAN interview of Richard Miniter, the author of Losing bin Laden: How Bill Clinton's Failures Unleashed Global Terror. Another of my movies documents bin Laden's interview in which he fingers clinton as the proximate cause of terrorism's success. Another movie documents clinton's confession of refusing Sudan's offer of bin Laden on a silver platter. (The confession was surreptitiously taped by Carl Limbacher of NewsMax.com)
|
bump
While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding). The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style. Further confirmation that the Wall was cover for clinton corruption:
Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect. ...Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.
|
bump
bump
It is quite clear that the agencies of government who should have been protecting us in these circumstances had not even barely contemplated this sort of event and therefore were not prepared to execute against any kind of plan and so you had massive miscommunication and failure to execute on what they needed to do. This is a persistent question that we have had. There seems to have been an enormous disconnect between the intelligence community and what it thought the threats were and the individuals who had to plan against given threats. So you see the FAA utterly unprepared for--uh--not taking any steps to prevent hijacking of this sort, and you hear NORAD--that is, our military--who are supposed to protect the domestic air space, saying they were focused completely outward and had almost no capacity to protect us internally. JAMIE GORELICK |
I would just say, though, Pete, and you've been at the Pentagon, too. You know this. The military is pretty good as a--an intelligence consumer. And my question today for General Myers and others was, why didn't you pull into yourselves and into your own planning process a government-wide assessment of what the threats were? And you know, John [Lehman] is right. They didn't get intelligence which said, "Focus inside." And so they were focused completely on the perimeter. And that has an enormous impact in what you're seeing in this report.... I mean, you can't fault the FAA here at all. I mean, the FAA did not have the right intelligence either. I mean, it was not exercising against this. It had protocols as we just discussed that were not remotely appropriate to the kind of hijacking that we had, to an airplane used as a missile. This is not the FAA's problem. This is the way in which intelligence, which was someplace in the intelligence community, did not find its way to policy makers and certainly to implementers like the FAA and like the Pentagon. JAMIE GORELICK |
This story merits its own book, but what deserves immediate comment is the willingness of the Clintons to risk everything to keep the cash pipeline open. Schwartz kept it open and full. Before he was through, Schwartz and Loral would donate roughly $2 million to the Clinton cause. Whether Schwartz gave additional money or favors off the books is a question that deserves asking. A second question that deserves asking is just how much damage Schwartz, Berger and the Clintons did to America's national security. A third question worth asking is whether Ron Brown's very real threats to expose these machinations led to his death. Some dare call it treason: |
I kinda agree- I could never follow the thread of these posts- they are very confusing
Is is a source code grap of a web site page?
Note: this is not a criticism of her FANTASTIC works~!! just the presentation
I've actually been working on the editing, presentation. trying to simplify. (they used to be worse!) ;)
check my response in post 44 for more info.
Mia T:
I am generally a lurker, but I have greatly enjoyed your posts over the years. Please repost them all!!!
SDCraigo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.