Posted on 08/13/2005 5:53:03 AM PDT by Mia T
|
e would have it backwards and miss the point entirely if we were to attribute The Gorelick Wall and the attendant metastasis of al Qaeda during the clintons' watch, (which, incidentally, was then in its incipient stage and stoppable), to the '60s liberal mindset.
Rampant '60s liberalism was not the underlying rationale for The Gorelick Wall.
Rather, The Gorelick Wall was the underlying rationale for--The Gorelick Wall was (insofar as '60s liberalism was the Wall's apparent impetus) a cynical cover for --the willful, methodical malpractice and malfeasance that was the product of the virulent clinton strain of rampant '60s liberalism.
While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding).
The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style.
Further confirmation that the Wall was cover for clinton corruption:
Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect....
The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.
Allegations of international clinton crimes swirling around the White House in 1995 and beyond support the thesis that the Wall was cover for international clinton crimes.
Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.
|
||
|
|
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS FOR THE CHILDREN, FOR AMERICA, FOR THE WORLD madhillary.com (coming soon) madhillary.blogspot.com COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005 |
The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)
THE JEANINE PIRRO--HILLARY CLINTON VIRTUAL MATCHUP
Hillary vs. Jeanine?
JEANINE PIRRO: indefinite prison/psych-ward term for all rapists
(HILLARY CLINTON: 16-year oval-office term for 2 certain rapists)
HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important, easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005
ping
ping
ping
typo--wrong publication date
Should be 8.13.05
" Why hillary clinton should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office... or any position of power--THE SERIES"
Not only am I in total agreement over hitlary never setting foot in the oval office as prez, I see we share the same philosophy that her name doesn't even deserve the normal respect of starting with capitol letters.
bump
I'm for her never again setting foot in the Oval Office, period.
BOTH clintons bump!
bump
ping
Her name... should not even be written... or spoken.
Starting today, I will refer to the frustrated, sexually-challenged opportunist as... 'IT'.
ping
chappaqua ping
rainmaker ping
What is the evidence for this statement. That evidence, if it exists, could change the results of the 2008 election.
|
Hillary Appointee Tied to 9/11 Blunder (excerpt) According to the Wall Street Journal, Gorelick fulfilled much the same role as Hubbell had, acting as Hillary's "eyes and ears at the Justice Department." While news of the CIA's scuttled 9/11 warning was a top story throughout the day on Friday - with nearly two dozen mainstream press reports, including a front page story in the New York Times - none of the reports so much as mentioned Gorelick's name, let alone her connection to Mrs. Clinton. The former first lady will almost undoubtedly seek the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination based in part on what the media descibe as her strong national security credentials.
|
The Clinton's should both be in jail. Following the Able Danger story and the politics they played with our National Security is truly sickening.
It keeps echoing in my ears that when questioned about Gorelick being on the Commission, Lehman was praising her for really being a hard worker and the one who delved into all of the material. Of course she did!
The Clinton's had their day of frolic in the White House, now they belong in the Big House.
Okay, now who hired Livingstone?
Thanks, Mia. I hope the good guys can develop more detail on this one. This could be the shot that sinks HRC's ship. To mix my metaphors, we need to put her in her political coffin and drive a hawthorne stake thru whatever it is she calls her heart.
BTTT
5.56mm
I agree. Good, Maria! Bump!

I'd like to see her step foot in the State Pen, and then not come out for 100 years.
ping
bttt
excellent compilation. i'm new here, at least as a participant, so i don't know if this presentation style is common or not, but i think that the leftwing style extreme and childish caricatures diminish your efforts and detract from the seriousness and validity of your points. the left have the childish thinking and emotions, let them have those methods of expressing them as well.
i'll be passing this on to friends, but without the moveon.org style kid stuff. they'd think i'd gone off the deep end otherwise.
Try clicking on the images to play the flashmovies.
I don't think that the normal mind can quite comprehend how the Clintons think because their thought processes are so foreign to most of us. There is nothing they do that is uncalculated or incidental. It is frightening beyond measure. We were fortunate to have survived two Clinton terms, but the consequences of his presidency will continue for many generations. A second Clinton presidency would be an abomination far beyond our ability to comprehend.
what would make you think that i didn't? especially with the odd and unnecessary "click" scrawled over them?
i don't get what your response has to do with my comment.
I want to know if Al Qaeda is working for China.
You referred to "caricatures." These are 3-d modeling and animation with audio straight from the principals, i.e., I indict hillary et al. with their own words.
I regard your criticism as valid, however. Each to his own taste. I could explain the rationale behind this style--but I don't think it would matter to you.
thanx Faith. You are absolutely right. Post-9/11, we no longer have the luxury to make that mistake. We must elect someone with character, competence and courage.
bttt
i appreciate your comment "to each his own taste", but i would be interested in your "rationale behind the style". I just wanted to let you know that from my perspective, and from the perspective of the kind of folks that i personally know who share my and your view on the content, the presentation style is at odds with the nature of the content.
the left thrive of mis characterizing, re characterizing, demonizing, ridiculing, and etc because that's all they've got.
i think the statements, actions, beliefs, and behaviors of the left are so egregious, that no drama and hyperbole is needed.
I actually agree with your last statement and have expressed similar sentiments for years. ("A farce of a farce doesn't parse" was something I said years ago.)
I have guests right now... am typing between courses. :)
Will get back to you later...
Did missus clinton have sex with THAT women? Jamie Gore-Lick?
It still hasn't. It goes all around, but never here. I'm losing it.
So sorry:(
It hasn't rained here, either. It's a veritable steambath. The laws of probability and meteorology can't be defied too much longer. Hang in there. :)
Tell me, what is your, and your friends', opinion of www.rushlimbaugh.com?
|
THE MACRO RATIONALE: It is my view that merely to type out and post an essay as one would for print media misses much of this medium's potential. My objective was to combine written with graphic commentary. The graphics took various forms but evolved into what I call my virtual characters, 3-D models with lip-syncing and flash animation using the politico's own words, own audio. THE STYLE: Creating 3-D models with lip-syncing and animation is not like picking up a brush or pen. There are software and hardware constraints that limit the output... I have been experimenting with the medium for a couple of years; I believe my later work, e.g., the Jeanine Pirro character, is better technically and aesthetically (this irrespective of Jeanine's beauty). ![]() (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) THE VIRTUAL HILLARY RATIONALE : My initial objective was to document, expose and indict the clintons with their own words and deeds. My first character was virtual hillary.
THE DOCUMENTING: If you play NANO-PRESIDENT to the end, it will link to hillary talks: on terror, which contains excerpts of the C-SPAN interview of Richard Miniter, the author of Losing bin Laden: How Bill Clinton's Failures Unleashed Global Terror. Another of my movies documents bin Laden's interview in which he fingers clinton as the proximate cause of terrorism's success. Another movie documents clinton's confession of refusing Sudan's offer of bin Laden on a silver platter. (The confession was surreptitiously taped by Carl Limbacher of NewsMax.com)
|
bump
|
While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding). The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style. Further confirmation that the Wall was cover for clinton corruption:
Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect. ...Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.
|

bump
bump
|
It is quite clear that the agencies of government who should have been protecting us in these circumstances had not even barely contemplated this sort of event and therefore were not prepared to execute against any kind of plan and so you had massive miscommunication and failure to execute on what they needed to do. This is a persistent question that we have had. There seems to have been an enormous disconnect between the intelligence community and what it thought the threats were and the individuals who had to plan against given threats. So you see the FAA utterly unprepared for--uh--not taking any steps to prevent hijacking of this sort, and you hear NORAD--that is, our military--who are supposed to protect the domestic air space, saying they were focused completely outward and had almost no capacity to protect us internally. JAMIE GORELICK |
|
I would just say, though, Pete, and you've been at the Pentagon, too. You know this. The military is pretty good as a--an intelligence consumer. And my question today for General Myers and others was, why didn't you pull into yourselves and into your own planning process a government-wide assessment of what the threats were? And you know, John [Lehman] is right. They didn't get intelligence which said, "Focus inside." And so they were focused completely on the perimeter. And that has an enormous impact in what you're seeing in this report.... I mean, you can't fault the FAA here at all. I mean, the FAA did not have the right intelligence either. I mean, it was not exercising against this. It had protocols as we just discussed that were not remotely appropriate to the kind of hijacking that we had, to an airplane used as a missile. This is not the FAA's problem. This is the way in which intelligence, which was someplace in the intelligence community, did not find its way to policy makers and certainly to implementers like the FAA and like the Pentagon. JAMIE GORELICK |
|
This story merits its own book, but what deserves immediate comment is the willingness of the Clintons to risk everything to keep the cash pipeline open. Schwartz kept it open and full. Before he was through, Schwartz and Loral would donate roughly $2 million to the Clinton cause. Whether Schwartz gave additional money or favors off the books is a question that deserves asking. A second question that deserves asking is just how much damage Schwartz, Berger and the Clintons did to America's national security. A third question worth asking is whether Ron Brown's very real threats to expose these machinations led to his death. Some dare call it treason: |
I kinda agree- I could never follow the thread of these posts- they are very confusing
Is is a source code grap of a web site page?
Note: this is not a criticism of her FANTASTIC works~!! just the presentation
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.