COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005 |
Posted on 06/26/2005 5:10:29 PM PDT by Mia T
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005 |
CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN
hillary clinton: ABUSER, NOT VICTIM
retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]
NOTE THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CLINTON REACTION TIME AND CONTENT TO THE TWO RAPE CHARGES
CATCHING THE CONSCIENCE OF THE KINGFISH
differential reaction to the two rape charges snares the clintons
CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)
1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)
HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 3
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 2
You are the greatest!
i live in pirros AG district and i dont much care for her. She hogs the camera and she doesnt seem genuine. I prefer Cox in this race.
Hogging the camera is actually an asset in this case--we would see a lot less of Chuck Schumer.
I judge Jeanine genuine by virtue of her accomplishments.
As for Cox, poetic justice, sweet revenge, if he could do it, but I don't believe he can defeat the Hildabeast... and preemptive action in '06 is the goal here, isn't it....
"i live in pirros AG district and i dont much care for her. She hogs the camera and she doesnt seem genuine. I prefer Cox in this race."
If the point of this race is to expose Hillary as a unethical, morally bankrupt opportunist and apologist for her husband's victimization of women, I don't see the point of running a woman married to a Mafia laywer that just got out of prison.
Maybe I'm missing something.
The point of this race is not merely to expose hillary; it is to defeat her.
This is a race between the women, not the husbands, notwithstanding the fact that if a rapist can be president, and a co-rapist, senator, certainly a westchester da who happens to be married to an alleged mob lawyer can be senator. It would be a step up for New York, it seems to me. ;)
It is important to remember that hillary clinton wasn't simply a passive partner ('enabler" or "apologist") in her husband's rapes, predations and assorted criminal enterprises. She participated. For power and treasure....
ping
I thank G-d for you -- and that we're on the same side!
[Phwew!]
Blessings -- Brian
You get bumped by virtue of your sense of humor! LOL
bttt
bttt
new thread ping
;)
time for the graphic bump
good morning Mia
thanks for the ping
bump
|
January 27, 2005
You Hillary watchers out there need to sit up and take notice of this little item in the New York Daily News today. Seems that some are suggesting the tough and brilliant Westchester County District Attorney Jeanine Pirro, is considering challenging Hillary -- I'll-do-anything-to-be-president-including-pretending-to-abandon-all-my-core-beliefs -- Clinton, for her New York Senate seat in 2006. Hillary may be tough, but Mrs. Pirro is too. I've been extremely impressed with this lady every time I've heard her speak, on Hannity and Colmes and elsewhere. No matter what Mrs. Pirro's chances of winning, her decision to challenge Hillary -- would be a very good thing.
Posted by David Limbaugh at January 27, 2005 10:10 AM |
|
Hil vs. Pirro in '06? Westchester County District Attorney Jeanine Pirro is considering challenging the former First Lady, according to political insiders. The GOP crimefighter, who is running for reelection this year, is not publicly discussing plans for higher office. But Pirro has a dizzying fund-raising schedule and the enthusiastic backing of Gov. Pataki. "We love Jeanine," said a source in Pataki's camp. Sources say it is becoming less likely by the day that former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who may be eying the White House, will challenge Clinton for the Senate seat. A Clinton-Pirro contest has the makings of a marquee matchup between two controversial and ambitious women. "This wouldn't be just a battle," longtime Pirro friend and Westchester radio station owner Bill O'Shaughnessy told the Daily News. "It would be a catfight, and my money would be on Jeanine." "There'll be more interest in this than in 'Desperate Housewives,'" he added. Never one to shy from the limelight, Pirro has an active schedule planned. Last night, Mayor Bloomberg hosted a $1,000-a-plate fund-raiser for Pirro at his upper East Side digs. On Feb 10, she will stage a $250-a-head soiree headlined by radio and TV personality Sean Hannity. And this weekend, Pirro is booked to speak to influential Conservative Party operatives. That party's leader, Mike Long, said Pirro's crime-fighting pedigree makes her an attractive candidate to his group, even though she is pro-choice. "I certainly think Jeanine could go toe-to-toe with the senator," said Long. Pirro carries the baggage of husband Al Pirro's 2000 conviction on federal tax evasion charges, which included allegations he fudged the couple's joint returns to support their lavish lifestyle. But O'Shaughnessy insisted she could get around that issue. "You cannot hold the omissions of the husband against the wife who has her own career," he said. Pirro's spokeswoman, Ann Marie Corbalis, insisted her boss plans to remain district attorney "as long as the people of Westchester want her." But Westchester GOP consultant Mike Edelman said Pirro is "taking a good hard look" at the 2006 state attorney general race, and a challenge against Clinton.
 |
|
But not all Republicans are helping Hillary. In New York state, Westchester County District Attorney Jeanine Pirro seems to be getting closer to running against her in the 2006 race for the Senate. Pirro has to be Hillary's worst nightmare. She is a pro-choice woman who even backs Medicaid funding for abortion and a supporter of gun control, affirmative action and gay civil unions. But Pirro is no Democrat. She strongly supports the Patriot Act, making the Bush tax cuts permanent and the diversion of Social Security tax revenues into private investment accounts. She has a tough-on-crime image from her constant appearances on New York City television, with a particular focus on family-values issues such as pedophilia and Internet pornography. Hillary has always thrived off right-wing challengers who flunk the litmus tests imposed by New York's liberal electorate. But, in Pirro, she has met someone whom she can't browbeat over abortion or the usual Democratic issues. Clinton is especially vulnerable to Pirro because Hillary can't pledge to serve out her term if she is reelected. Polls show that her refusal to do so strikes New Yorkers very badly. Having extended the welcome mat to this carpetbagger and taken her at her word that she wanted to be part of the Big Apple, they feel they are being treated like doormats in reelecting someone who will obviously begin to miss votes and focus all her energy on running for president as soon as she is reelected. If Pirro attracts the massive national funding she is likely to get, she can wage a very strong race against Hillary. My bet is that Clinton thinks the better of it and drops out of the race if Pirro comes on strong. Why should she risk the presidency -- and have to spend $20 million -- just to get reelected to her old job? And … if Hillary drops out after Pirro has built up a head of steam, it could give the GOP a Senate seat in the most unlikely of places -- Clinton's back yard.
|
You are the best, Mia T! Thank you for your tireless efforts to keep us informed about Mrs. Rodham Clinton.
thank you. :)
thanx. :)
|
Pirro Blasts Clinton Viagra Giveaway The New York prosecutor who said this week that she may challenge Hillary Clinton for her Senate seat next year is blasting a Clinton administration program that gave free Viagra to sex offenders, saying it was tantamount to "state-assisted sexual assault." "I am outraged," Westchester County District Attorney Jeanine Pirro told Fox News. "Because we all know that level three sex offenders - and my office prosecutes them all the time - are repeat offenders." Without mentioning Mrs. Clinton or her husband by name, Pirro railed against the government boondoggle, saying, "By paying for their Viagra, it amounts to state-assisted sexual assault." In May 1998 - during the height of the Monica Lewinsky scandal - the Clinton Administration told state officials that it "intended to require their Medicaid programs to pay for medically approved uses of the impotence drug Viagra," according to the New York Times. The Clinton Viagra giveaway continued unfettered until this week, when New York State officials discovered that nearly 200 convicted sex offenders were using the program to obtain the impotence drug. Mrs. Clinton's potential challenger said the Viagra program has likely led to further sexual attacks. "My office has prosecuted cases where pedophiles have used Viagra on children, where 86-year-old pedophiles are using Viagra, so they can continue to molest our children," Pirro told Fox. "Shame on us for allowing this to happen," she added. "As long as you have been convicted and are now registered as a sexual deviant, you should not be getting this, because it amounts to the government helping you to assault other victims." In a statement issued earlier this week, Sen. Clinton said she was concerned that the Viagra giveaway "poses safety concerns for the public." But she declined to acknowledge any responsibility for the blunder, insisting instead that the program had been misused. "There is no doubt that the news of sexual offenders receiving Viagra under the Medicaid program is deeply disturbing and runs contrary to the purpose of Medicaid which is to provide health care coverage for uninsured, low-income individuals." Sen. Clinton said she will "explore legislative options to address this issue." On Monday, Mrs. Pirro announced she was considering a run for statewide office, including a possible challenge to the top Democrat.
|
ping
bump
bump
ping
bump for your tagline
:^)
bump
bump
bump
bump
bump
bump
The best candidate I can see at this point is John Spencer, he was basically the "Rudy Giulani" of the New York suburbs and was an extremely successful and popular Mayor of Yonkers as well as a prosperous banker and decorated Vietnam War Veteran.
Cox would be my second choice but his biggest positive: instance name recongition from being son-in-law of a U.S. President, is also his biggest drawback (Nixon?!)
Pirro should run for A.G. of NY instead of U.S. Senate. The NY Republican Party really NEEDS a credible candidate to take the open seat with Spitzer out of the way, and c'mon, the "Westchester County District Attorney" is much more credible as a candidate for A.G. than a candidate for the U.S. Senate. The idea that she's the "only" candidate who can beat Hillary is silly. First off, ANYONE aside from Rudy is going have a big uphill struggle. Second, she's a little known RINO with a tainted husband. Cox and Spencer are just as credible.
Pirro for A.G. and Spencer for U.S. Senate.
1- The goal here is to preemptively short-circuit the clintons' 2nd assault on this country.
2- RINO is a plus in NY
3- An alleged mob lawyer husband is a step up from a documented rapist husband (and wife) (this, not even beginning to factor in all of his--their--other crimes, betrayals and utter failures)
4- Pirro, having fought for the abused woman for her 30-year career, is the corapist clinton's worst nightmare.
5- Pirro has star power in her own right; and unlike clinton, she also has beauty, eloquence, intelligence, independent achievements, etc. all of which serve only to underscore what an ugly, unqualified zipper-hoisted fishwife clinton is.
WHY JEANINE:
1- The goal here is to preemptively short-circuit the clintons' 2nd assault on this country.2- RINO is a plus in NY
3- An alleged mob lawyer husband is a step up from a documented rapist husband (and wife) (this, not even beginning to factor in all of his--their--other crimes, betrayals, dysfunctions, dangers and utter failures)
4- Pirro, having fought for the abused woman for her 30-year career, is the corapist clinton's worst nightmare.
5- Unlike hillary clinton, Jeanine Pirro has star power in her own right, has beauty, eloquence, intelligence, independent achievements, etc., all of which serve only to underscore what an ugly, unqualified, zipper-hoisted fishwife clinton is.
1- If the goal is "stop Hillary" before she gets her claws on the oval office, then the only solution is "draft Rudy". He’s the ONLY candidate who would be LIKELY to “beat Hillary”. ANYONE else, whether they are Ed Cox, Jeannie Pirro, or John Spencer, will face an UPHILL battle. Therefore if we have a second tier candidate we might as well have one who stands up for GOP values and has some political track record. If you can find ANY poll showing Pirro polling even with the Hilderbeast and can therefore “beat Hillary” (while Cox and Spencer lose in a landslide), feel free to let me know and I’ll switch my alligance to Pirro. Otherwise I repeat my assessement that ANY Republican other than Rudy faces an uphill battle. 2- Please explain to former U.S. Senator Al D’Amato (R-NY) that he was unelectable and should have “stepped aside” for “electable” RINO Jacob Javits. You also might want to explain this concept to former U.S. Senator James Buckley (R-NY)
3- “An alleged mob lawyer husband” is the EXACT reason why Pirro ‘s attempts to go after the criminal Clinton corruption will backfire as the media skews her own family’ scandals. Cox and Spencer look like saints in comparison.
4- Pirro, as “Westchester County District Attorney” who has NEVER been involved in campaigns before, is MUCH better suited to run for the OPEN seat of Attorney General of New York (where the NY GOP desperately NEEDS a credible candidate), than try to seek the U.S. Senate as an entry level position. Cox and Spencer are far more familiar with politics being a bloodsport.
5- The idea that “Jeanine Pirro” is a household name in NY with “star power” is pretty silly. Far more people have heard of Richard Nixon’s son in law than a district attorney from Westchester. And the fact that Mayor John Spencer, a conservative Republican, is venerated in the largely Democrat suburban area of Yonkers, gives him far more “star power” than Hillary. As a beloved Mayor and decorated Vietnam War vet, he is the very much the suburban version of the Rudy and the kind of saavy pit bull who can put the Clintons in their place on the campaign trail.
HILLARY: A 30-YEAR CAREER ATTACKING AMERICAN TROOPS
Hillary dishonors our troops and Voted YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam. In Washington to begin forming a campaign team, John Spencer said Clinton's questioning of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld at a Senate Armed Services hearing Thursday constituted a "thinly veiled attack" on President Bush and was another example of how Democratic rhetoric on the war is dividing the country. Clinton, a Democrat, asked Rumsfeld to repudiate White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove's remarks this week that liberals are not tough enough on America's enemies. She said the remarks, made at a Conservative Party dinner in New York City, were "insulting" and "disturbing" to people like herself who had "legitimate questions" about the administration's conduct of the war while supporting it.” She says we all love our troops. But then to be silent when politicians like (Sen.) Dick Durbin, Howard Dean and Ted Kennedy and John Kerry attack the president, that's really aiding and comforting the enemy," Spencer said. Spencer said he was particularly incensed that Clinton brought up the Vietnam War and its divisiveness while questioning Rumsfeld. Clinton said that she was old enough to remember how deeply divided the country was "and never want to see that again." But Spencer took issue, saying that as a Vietnam veteran he was "appalled that she would raise the fact that our nation was divided during Vietnam, and then proceed to divide us further today." This is just another example of Senator Clinton's attempts to have it both ways; She voted for the war in Iraq, and then bashes President Bush about the war every opportunity she gets. It should have occurred to Hillary that her remarks demoralize the troops, since the vast majority believe in the Iraq cause.
|
As I posted elsewhere to Doug from Upland: Because Jeanine's championing of the abused woman approaches iconic status, she doesn't have to mention the clinton rapes explicitly. Her mere presence reminds the voter. And voters ignorant of the facts will surely be filled in by Jeanine's surrogates, the new media and the clintons' many victims. Principled feminists will take note and not find it difficult at all to vote for Jeanine. That said, I don't know Spencer, but as I recall, Cox is similarly connected to scandal by way of marriage. As for their relative star power, Jeanine is a fixture on cable, telegenic, eloquent, fast on her feet; which count for more than Cox's 40-year-old, 15-minutes-of-fame marriage to a president reviled by many voters. As for your d'amato et al. analogy, it doesn't apply. The times are different, the demographics are different, and, most important, the goal is different. You can't separate the argument from the goal. And as for your "if not Rudy then not RINO" argument: If it is not silly, it is certainly circular. And by the way, I would not classify Jeanine Pirro as a RINO. She lacks the necessary characteristic of the RINO species--the wimp gene located on the opportunism chromosome. Indeed, Pirro does stand up for arguably the most critical GOP value of our time. She is tough on crime, tough on national security... as opposed to the clintons.... hillary talks:ON TERROR  (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) |
should read, "marriage to the daughter of a president..."
bump
Basically, once a year all the feminists march around campus saying how strong they are because together they can march around without fear and take back the night. Of course, they don't venture a few blocks into Harlem, but just hang around campus with security protection. Anyway, they accuse everyone in the planet of rape. When they are done marching, they have a sit-in all night where all the women get up and tell everybody how they were raped. One or two of them give a compelling story, but most seem to be making it up.
Anyway, the one time I watched the rally they were so desperate for rape accusations that they had this one girl get up and tell about how afwul the football guys were on the floor of her dorm. I thought she was going to say that they gang raped her. Well, it turns out that all they did was tear the Micahel Jackson poster off of her door. Anyway, she went to describe that as a form of mental rape, etc. etc.
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN,
FOR AMERICA,
FOR THE WORLD
madhillary.com (coming soon)
madhillary.blogspot.com
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
