Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How did the flower children fall for the clintons, 2 such self-evident thugs and opportunists?
The New York Times, NewsMax.com | 7.11.05 | Mia T et al.

Posted on 07/11/2005 1:46:12 AM PDT by Mia T

How did the flower children fall for the clintons, 2 such self-evident thugs and opportunists?

(FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!)

by Mia T et al., 7.11.05

 

The book begins with a puzzle: How did the flower children fall for such a self-evident thug and opportunist? And it offers a possible hypothetical answer, which is that ''the Night Creature'' -- Nixon -- and his heirs and assigns could not ever possibly be allowed to be right about anything.

When Eszterhas writes about Nixon, and his admirers like Lucianne Goldberg, he hits an overdrive button and summons the bat cave of purest evil. He hasn't read as much recent history as he thinks he has, or he would know that his forebears were mesmerized in precisely the same way to believe that Alger Hiss was framed.

Thus does Nixon inherit an undeserved and posthumous victory. If by chance we ever elect a bent and unscrupulous Republican president, he or she will have a whole new thesaurus of excuses, public and ''private,'' with which to fend off impeachment. These ''bipartisan'' excuses will have been partly furnished by the ''nonjudgmental'' love generation. If Eszterhas had had the guts to face this fact, he could have written a book more like ''F.I.S.T.'' instead of ''Sliver.''

Meanwhile, and almost but not quite unbelievably, we await the president's comment on Juanita Broaddrick's allegation.

Christopher Hitchens
Basic Instinct
Hitchens on "American Rhapsody"
The New York Times, July 30, 2000
HITCHENS ON THE CLINTONS

 

Edward Klein's book "The Truth About Hillary" has made the New York Times bestseller list for the second week in a row - a development that has the Times book review spitting mad.

As NewsMax reported over a week ago, Klein debuted on the Times list this week in the No. 2 two slot.

Despite an orchestrated campaign to keep Klein off of major TV talk shows, NewsMax has learned that the bestselling author will be on the Times list next week as well, in the No. 4 position.

The liberal Gray Lady apparently doesn't like the fact that one of their own -- Klein is former editor of the New York Times Magazine -- penned a biting biography of one of the paper's icons, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The Times has yet to review the book, but took the unusual step in Sunday's book section to publish a disclaimer attacking the book from pillar to post in a sidebar column adjacent to the bestseller list.

"'The Truth About Hillary,' has united [no easy task] literary critics," Timesman Dwight Garner fumed, adding "it is easily this year's most vilified book."

Then Garner promptly joined in the vilification:

"Writing in the Book Review in 1988, Joyce Carol Oates coined the term 'pathography' to describe hatchet jobs like Klein's. Reading Oates's taxonomy of that genre today, it sounds as if she somehow had an advance copy of Klein's book rotting at her elbow."

Rotting?

.... Shall we call that liberal "pathocoverage"?

Klein, a veteran journalist and editor with credentials well beyond anything Kelley has to offer, said he isn't bothered by the elite media's disdain for his book.

"My book's staying power on The Times list is testimony to the power of the Internet and conservative talk radio," he told NewsMax on Saturday. "The mainstream liberal media no longer have a monopoly on what's news and what isn't, and that's a healthy thing for America."

More healthy still, "The Truth About Hillary's" bestseller status shows that readers were willing to defy the media blockade orchestrated by the Clintons.

Hours after speaking to NewsMax, Klein told WABC Radio's Monica Crowley:

"Hillary and her people have called up . . . all the TV networks and the newspapers and said to them that, if you give Ed Klein exposure, we're not going to be very happy about it." The result: "I've been canceled on many of the TV shows that I was booked on," Klein said, "and have not had my book reviewed by any of the major media."

Klein appeared on Fox News' Hannity & Colmes show the day his book was released on June 21, but the network quickly canceled three scheduled interviews with the author.

A wave of other cancelations followed as CNN's Lou Dobbs and Sinclair Broadcasting's News Central were the only other programs to interview the author.

But the media censorship may be working in Klein's favor. Not only is his book a certified New York Times bestseller, it also debuts this week on the Publisher's Weekly bestseller list in the No. 4 slot.

Klein's 'Truth About Hillary' Hits NY Times Again; Paper Lashes Out
Carl Limbacher
Sunday, July 10, 2005 6:05 p.m. EDT

HILLARY: NIXON-PLUS
BEWARE THE SYNERGY

Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important,
easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.


KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA

an amazon.com review, too
counter the clintonoids, keep it readily visible
FReep rating of review
HERE
(NB: review listed twice. rate BOTH. Thanx!)

 

by Mia T, 7.3.05














issus clinton's profound dysfunction, her textbook case of paranoia and megalomania, her fascistic methods and mindset, are fast becoming impossible to conceal... even from the most casual observer.

And this is the case less because of the Klein book than because of hillary clinton's real-time reaction to it.

Old media have two choices--continue to play the access-journalism game and feed their own increasing irrelevance ... or band together to resist this sick, dangerous... person, end their 4th-estate malfeasance and protect the country from a second and likely fatal assault from this inept, corrupt, ruthless pair of egomaniacal demagogues.

Hillary clinton needs old media more than old media need hillary clinton.

 

Leni Riefenstahl was the film genius who outmaneuvered propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels to chronicle Hitler's 1934 Nuremberg rallies in perhaps the most notorious documentary ever filmed, Triumph of the Will. For sheer power, reach, and ruthlessness, however, the fascist Riefenstahl operation doesn't hold a candle to the Clinton agitprop machine...

Whereas Leni Riefenstahl symbolizes the naïve actress and director who is induced to deal with devils, Hillary Clinton is actor, director and--many would argue--devil, rolled into one willful, corrupt, vengeful, despotic, paranoic package.

And so we have today... here in America... in America!... Hillary Clinton and her media apparatchiks conducting a campaign of censorship-by-terror that is without precedent; without precedent even if we include in the calculus the despotic Clinton years....

from HILLARY CLINTONSTAHL
Mia T

also:

THE OLYMPIC HILDABEAST FLOPS
hillary stupidly invokes clinton utter failure: 9/11

 

 

thanx to WorkingClassFilth for the video
special thanx to Jim Robinson


The closest... Clinton has ever come to answering allegations... he raped an Arkansas woman in 1978 is a distance measurable only in light-years.

CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]
by Mia T, 6.11.05

In a novel twist of logic and reality during the First Rapist's impeachment trial, the co-rapist portrayed the endless string of clinton rapes as significant clinton public policy, euphemistically dubbing chronic clinton predation "ministering to troubled young girls."

Mia T, First Rapist's Rose-Garden Escape: The Full Story

There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that. ... Furthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

GEORGE WILL, SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL

[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]

 

"I could hardly breathe. Gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, 'What do you mean? What are you saying? Why did you lie to me?' I was furious and getting more so by the second. He just stood there saying over and over again, 'I'm sorry. I'm so sorry. I was trying to protect you and Chelsea."..."I was dumbfounded, heartbroken and outraged that I'd believed him at all."...The family went to Martha's Vineyard for vacation right after his testimony...."Buddy, the dog, came along to keep Bill company. He was the only member of our family who was still willing to."

hear hillary clinton
Living History
published by the clintons' personal agitprop-and-money-laundering machine,
Simon & Schuster

 

"I know bill clinton."

hear hillary clinton


The rape took place while Bill was running for governor. Hillary came bursting into the room to talk to two people, one of whom I personally know.

She said "You won't believe what this [expletive] did now. He tried to rape some b*tch."

It was the job of these two to squelch the story.

doug from upland to Sean Hannity,
WABC, 10/16/00

"It's no longer acceptable to say that the abuse and mistreatment of women is cultural. It should be called what it is: criminal."

Hillary Clinton
addressing the UN, 3.4.99


"Crucial to this protective wall was the secret police, a group of private detectives hired to protect hillary and 'Saturday night bill.' Their tactics included digging up dirt on women who might be linked to bill in order to cow them into silence. There is even some evidence of possible physical intimidation."

HEAR DICK MORRIS






"I got the letters from Pellicano to these women intimidating them. I had tapes of conversations from Pellicano to the women. I got handwritten letters from the women."

[Pellicano played a critical role in Mr. Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign by "suppressing" "inconvenient" accounts from several women, by concocting fraudulent "proof" (later discredited) that Gennifer Flowers doctored the damning tape of clinton, and again inside the clinton operation in January 1998, four days after the Monica Lewinsky story broke, to falsely paint Monica as simply a lying stalker, a claim later discredited by clinton's own DNA.]

MARY MATALIN
1997, CBS


 

 





Connecticut Rep. Chris Shays said on a talk radio show Wednesday that, based on secret evidence he reviewed during the impeachment controversy, he believes President Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, not once, but twice.

Talk-show host Tom Scott of Clear Channel Broadcasting, New Haven (WELI 960) asked Shays about the mysterious impeachment "evidence room," prompting the GOP moderate to say that Broaddrick "disclosed that she had been raped, not once, but twice" to Judiciary Committee investigators.

Shays, who is often hailed by the New York Times for his independent judgment and good sense, found the evidence compelling:

"I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

HEAR CHRISTOPHER SHAYS
'Shays Shocker Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice'
National Review Online
By NR staff
8/02/2000




 



"Who is Juanita Broaddrick? I've never heard of her!" cried Betty Friedan, the founder of modern feminism. Friedan's outburst came at last Friday's conference, entitled "The Legacy and Future of Hillary Rodham Clinton." Held at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. D.C., the event offered a chilling microcosm of an angry, divided America.

For nearly an hour, a five-woman panel had been debating whether Hillary qualified as a "feminist heroine." I thought Broaddrick's claim of having been raped by Hillary's husband had some bearing on this point, so I broached the subject during the question-and-answer period. Friedan's dyspeptic denial followed.

Was Friedan telling the truth? Maybe. And maybe all those millions of Germans who professed ignorance of the death camps were telling the truth too. The problem is, having admitted her ignorance, Friedan showed no interest in exploring the matter further. And that was the problem with the Germans too.

Totalitarian impulses flourished at the conference. Taking a page from Soviet psychiatry, some Clintonites suggested that Hillary hating might be a mental illness.

Richard Poe
The Hillary Conspiracy





"If you look at white women, and I think that was the key to this election, Kerry won 45% based on the exit polls--but they're generally in agreement--Kerry won 45%, Bush won 55% of white women. By contrast, Bush won only 45% of white women in 2000, so he upped is percentages by 10 points. In 1996, bill clinton won 48% of white women compared to Bob Dole's 43%. That is a huge, huge difference. I don't think you can lay all that at the doorstep of moral values. I think that this president unabashedly and abjectly took the issue of terror and used it to terrorize... white women."

HEAR HAROLD ICKES
Washington Journal
Nov. 8, 2004
C-SPAN



(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

Given the silence from the West Wing, Mrs. Broaddrick this week sought answers from Hillary Clinton, whose telescopic feminism apparently sees injustice to women everywhere except the kind which occurs closer to home. In a letter to Mrs. Clinton recalling their meeting shortly after the reported assault occurred, she wondered about the significance of Mrs. Clinton's words to her at that time. Thank you, Mrs. Broaddrick says Mrs. Clinton told her, for "everything you do for Bill."

"What did you mean, Hillary?" her letter continued. "Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to keep quiet?"

The not-so-subtle implication of the letter is that Mrs. Clinton is, in fact, her husband's enabler. Dealing with her husband's promiscuity and worse might keep her from dealing with the important issues facing the people of New York, namely her candidacy. One might call it a Faustian bargain except that even Mephistopheles might not lower himself to sign such a deal.

While there is little in the way of an official response to Mrs. Broaddrick from Mr. and Mrs. Clinton, their surrogates have doubtless been quietly at work trying to undermine her credibility. It's fair to point out that Mrs. Broaddrick initially denied that then-Gov. Clinton raped her, as she now charges, except that such a defense would never be acceptable were the accused someone else. If a woman only belatedly claims to be a victim of rape or sexual harassment, the argument ordinarily goes, it's because she was at the mercy of a man she could see only through the glass ceiling. Recall that when defenders of Clarence Thomas noted Anita Hill's decision to follow Mr. Thomas from job to job were hardly the actions of a woman suffering from sexual harassment, as she later claimed, feminists responded that the poor, powerless woman had no choice but to follow him given limited employment opportunities.

Mrs. Broaddrick's charges, while graver, might be equally suspect on that basis, except that neither Clinton is in the strongest position to call her a liar.

So far neither has.*

 

Did he rape that woman, Juanita Broaddrick?
The Wall Street Journal
EDITORIAL
October 18, 2000

*GOTO:

AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON
BY JUANITA BROADDRICK

DO YOU REMEMBER?

SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000

 

As I watched Rick Lazio's interview on Fox News this morning, I felt compelled to write this open letter to you, Mrs. Clinton. Brit Hume asked Mr. Lazio's views regarding you as a person and how he perceived you as a candidate. Rick Lazio did not answer the question, but I know that I can. You know it, too.

I have no doubt that you are the same conniving, self-serving person you were twenty-two years ago when I had the misfortune to meet you. When I see you on television, campaigning for the New York senate race, I can see the same hypocrisy in your face that you displayed to me one evening in 1978. You have not changed.

I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton's bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, "Bill has talked so much about Juanita", and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying "we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill". At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, "Everything you do for Bill". You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.

Yes, I can answer Brit Hume's question. You are the same Hillary that you were twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person.

 


Juanita Broaddrick
Arkansas


 

Mia T, June 9, 1999

The only way they can win is to convince people that we're space aliens.

bill clinton


 

With thy sharp teeth this knot intrinsicate
Of life at once untie.

Antony and Cleopatra V, ii, 304-05









eggy Noonan's excellent piece in yesterday's Wall Street Journal is really the story of the death of democracy. At its core it is the description of the human double helix gone terribly awry, of a denatured protein grotesquely twisted, of two mutant, tangled strands of DNA, the basest imaginable of base pairs linked permanently, as firmly as guanine to cytosine, bill inexorably to hillary and conversely, doing what they do best, and doing it relentlessly.

Killing.
Killing insidiously.
Killing as they pose and pander and feel our pain.

My only complaint is with Peggy Noonan's title.
The Mad Boomer, doesn't begin to capture candidate clinton considered separately or even taken as the self-anointed "twofer," permanently conjoined at that cavity conspicuously empty except for ego, that place where brain and soul and guts and heart normally reside.

This is not to say that she -- that they -- are not both quite mad and of that self-indulgent, arrogantly, ignorantly solipsistic age sandwiched flatly between yesterday's innocence and tomorrow's insouciance. Rather, it is that their madness and their boomerism don't even begin to explain their noxious influence: The cloying, internally inconsistent clinton calculus. The unspoken clinton threats. They permeate the atmosphere like a coiling miasma, choking off all freedom.

Even in New York.
Especially in New York.
When she wrote "The New Colossus," Emma Lazarus hardly had in mind this pair of mutant, deadly, twisted aliens.

So forget Arkansas-Illinois carpetbaggery and standard issue muckraking. The clintons are aliens of quite another sort. They are extrinsic, not of this world. They are inhuman. They are dehumanizing.

You may recall that the first act of this story of two degenerates maintained by iterating idiots, farce of farce ad infinitum, was generated quite by accident by iterated AlGoreRhythm, who, it should be noted, is now himself the object of iterated calculation by said degenerates who want iteration 2004 all for themselves.

And thus the odd bit of bloody Gore in Act II: The ugly sight of a corrupt, bottom-heavy hillary self-impaled on the horns of a Treason-Dilemma- masquerading-as-a-Third-Term-Dilemma-masquerading-as-a-Senate-stampede, for example, or bill's recent unsolicited, underwhelming Times interview on the Gore candidacy.

Act I was called "The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover." Ostensibly the tale of the wife of a bloodthirsty crime boss who finds romance with a bland bookseller between courses at her husband's restaurant, it was in fact the Thyestean and moveable -- yet unmoving -- feast of hillary clinton at her husband's sham restitution. (Note the reciprocity. The sham restitution in Act II is all hillary's.)

Food, color coding, sex, murder, torture and cannibalism were the exotic (if mostly horizontal) fare in this beautifully filmed but brutally uncompromising modern memoir which passed as ancient fable about nouveau riche rapacity.

Not for the faint at heart, Purple Hearts or queazy stomachs, this depiction of the gross debasement of America was heavily peppered with irony and dark humor throughout.

Although she baked no cookies, didn't do illicit land or cattle deals and stood by no man, hillary clinton starred in the triple role of the Cook, the Thief and his Wife. Her lover was played at once vaporously and in workmanlike fashion by the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt, with Janet Reno, between her stints rendering intermittent injustice for the Husband, as the reliable stand-in. Sidney Blumenthal was the stand-in for the Cook and Craig Livingstone the stand-in for the Thief. The last-minute addition of Christopher Hitchens as the snitch was a stroke of absolute genius notwithstanding its cerebral accident, its predictable-if-perfect pitch and its facile alliteration.

Although Act I had no rating, the new clinton soccer-mom directive will require a photo ID for any viewer without independent proof of illegal alien DNC <-> DNA sequencing.

In Act II, rabid anti-clinton voters, roughly 33% of the U.S. populace according to as-yet-unpodded pollsters, become increasingly aware that they are disappearing in droves and being replaced by alien pod replicas which have their physical attributes but lack all anti-clinton affect.

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

THE ALIENS

 

COPYRIGHT Mia T 1999



deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 

FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 1
BEWARE THE SYNERGY

Nixonian paranoia
and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important,
easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.



KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA

an amazon.com review, too
counter the clintonoids, keep it readily visible
FReep rating of review HERE
(NB: review listed twice. rate BOTH. Thanx!)



THE OLYMPIC HILDABEAST FLOPS
hillary stupidly invokes clinton utter failure: 9/11


HILLARY CLINTONSTAHL
clinton agitprop machine censors truth about hillary


BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST



CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN


hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"

("I am not a crook")


hillary clinton: ABUSER, NOT VICTIM


retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]


NOTE THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CLINTON REACTION TIME AND CONTENT TO THE TWO RAPE CHARGES


CATCHING THE CONSCIENCE OF THE KINGFISH
differential reaction to the two rape charges snares the clintons


CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)


1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)


HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue


JENNINGS DOES A DIMBLEBY: clinton legacy-RAGE redux


THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 3


THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 2


THE JEANINE PIRRO--HILLARY CLINTON VIRTUAL MATCHUP


Hillary vs. Jeanine?


JEANINE PIRRO: indefinite prison/psych-ward term for all rapists
(HILLARY CLINTON: 16-year oval-office term for 2 certain rapists)


HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important,
easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.


deletehillary.blogspot.com
virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
hillarytalks.blogspot.com
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

coming soon! deletehillary.com
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintoncorruption; clintondysfunctiion; clintonfailure; clintonineptitude; clintonrape; clintonscandals; corapist; hillary; hillaryclinton; hillaryscandals; megalomania; nixon; nixonplus; paranoid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last

1 posted on 07/11/2005 1:46:12 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

bad trip bong...er bing... er... ping


2 posted on 07/11/2005 1:55:17 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

THANKS for the ping, Mia.


3 posted on 07/11/2005 1:56:58 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Pat The Postman

What is it, in particular, that you disagree with?

That hillary clinton employs fascistic methods of media control?

or my point that, "[w]hereas Leni Riefenstahl symbolizes the naïve actress and director who is induced to deal with devils, Hillary Clinton is actor, director and--many would argue--devil, rolled into one willful, corrupt, vengeful, despotic, paranoic package."???


5 posted on 07/11/2005 2:08:27 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jla

psychedelisized ping


6 posted on 07/11/2005 2:14:32 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

catch a buzz


7 posted on 07/11/2005 2:16:13 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

flower power


8 posted on 07/11/2005 2:17:14 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

bad scene


9 posted on 07/11/2005 2:20:37 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Good post, Mia. I beg to differ slightly -- It isn't the "flower children" who are falling for the Clintons.. The flower children were quite different from the second wave of wannabe's that came upon the heels of the "flower power movement".

I was in SF during the 60s. The *genuine* flower children were fun; not hateful. Their philosophy, while very flaky, was not angry. Beyond calling this "on the heels" movement "wannabe's" (to power, fame) I haven't come up with a term to describe the second wavers. What we all got stuck with were the "angry wannabe's". The peacefulness of the original flower children was shoved aside in the name of Power and Control and Domination; anger and hate. Woodstock exemplified this perfectly, to me.

10 posted on 07/11/2005 2:23:20 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pat The Postman; All

Outrageousness is an essential element of clinton corruption. The rank obscenity of the clintons' crimes -- rape -- murder (did you REALLY look into the death of Ron Brown?) -- and now treason -- allows clinton hacks to reasonably brand all clinton accusers clinton-hating neo-Nazi crazies (ignoring the plain fact that some of us are Northeast Jews of leftist origin).

HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important,
easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.



11 posted on 07/11/2005 2:31:33 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

"Gotta get some for my brother. He's got a nose like a vacuum cleaner!"


12 posted on 07/11/2005 2:39:04 AM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
2 such self-evident thugs and opportunists

Unfortunately, nothing substantial was evident about them at all in 1992, thanks to the compliant media.

They're now hoping that same compliant media will paint Hillary as a wonderful, calm, pleasant, and very able woman. It may well work! I do not trust the ignorant voters (See Jay Walking).

****

Try swallowing the word "pleasant" with "Hillary"! NEVER!

13 posted on 07/11/2005 2:44:47 AM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alia
You make an interesting distinction.

I suppose Eszterhas and Hitchens are writing about that perpetually angry, forever un-deflowered subset of flower children,
the chronically enraged naifs like Barbra Streisand
and so many of her equally credulous and angry contemporaries on the Upper West Side...
as well as those slightly younger, like
Pinch Sulzberger and Michael Moore.



MOORE IS LESS--THE MOVIE
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA
 
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)



The Deadly Kerry-Hollywood Axis
HOW CAN YOU PUT YOUR CHILDREN'S LIVES IN ITS HANDS?
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)


Look, Larry... [W]e were... not at war in the 1990s... and young Americans were not deployed... under President Clinton. What American would not trade the movement in the right direction that we had under President Clinton?

 

John Kerry
Larry King Live
July 8, 2004

kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 
The Parallel Universe of Jamie Gorelick
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
thanx to Fixit for the audio

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

-PREEMPTION-
(the whole ball of wax)
Kerry is UNFIT #20:
THUMBSUCKER SERIES
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

thanx to YaYa123

UNFIT #10: 9/10 mindset
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

hillary talks:ON TERROR

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004



deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 

FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005


14 posted on 07/11/2005 3:10:24 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

Bump for later reading...Mia T's postings take all day to get through, but are always worth it!


15 posted on 07/11/2005 3:11:36 AM PDT by Wingy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Mia T

Sorry I missed your larger point: Hillary using the "language of the Flower Power Children" in order to seize the nation.


17 posted on 07/11/2005 3:15:08 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pat The Postman
Since your "critique" omitted any reason as to how you reached your conclusions I'll offer you this allegory, one closer to home for you -

think of Hillary Clinton as America's needle park.

18 posted on 07/11/2005 3:15:51 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
forgot him...

dox in socks on lummox in box on fox

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004


19 posted on 07/11/2005 3:16:44 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Mia T, I was there; I watched the whole thing come down. On the heels of "flower power" -- black panthers, violent gays, nasty feminists, anti-repub, anti-family, zen, navel gazing, free-sex, total honest, pop-therapy, group-therapy... I witnessed the whole music scene change. I witnessed a cultural nuclear bomb dropping on an area of the country -- and its mushroom cloud of obfuscation under a rhetoric that was clearly "anti-country, anti-constitution, anti-American". And saw it grow and sweep across the nation, predominantly through "pub ed" and aide and abettors in the MSM. The flower children were silenced by these angry upstagers.

I saw the fear in the eyes of many of the flower children. Told to conform, or shove it.

20 posted on 07/11/2005 3:22:58 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
bump
21 posted on 07/11/2005 3:23:56 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pat The Postman

I don't call hillary clinton a fascist. I say she uses fascistic methods and that she has a fascistic mindset. You say you are new here.

I would suggest you do some research here on the clintons.

As for Leni Refienstahl, she does symbolize the unwitting actor induced to deal with devils, whether that symbol is factually accurate, or just some more of Refienstahl's propaganda. I am not sure we can ever know the truth.

The truth about hillary clinton, on the other hand, is being documented, before our eyes and in real-time, often, oops!, by hilllary clinton, herself.


22 posted on 07/11/2005 3:29:13 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Riefenstahl


23 posted on 07/11/2005 3:31:52 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Alia

24 posted on 07/11/2005 3:32:04 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jla

out of sight


25 posted on 07/11/2005 3:36:01 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Deep down inside of every flower child was a selfish thug
waiting to get out....

imo


26 posted on 07/11/2005 3:46:19 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Does the Red Crescent have falafel dollies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla
I think I'd like to read this book.

Found a book in 90s "Women Like Us" which seems to be no longer available. About the generation of women (Hillary's) starting at an all woman's college. (Used to have a copy, I thought it was so useful; kept lending it out to women; didn't get it back.)

Synopsis of the book: Women dreaming they could have it all, sans reality; just because they wanted it. Lives end up in ruins, they attend their college reunion.. and analogize that they indeed had it all. That now that they'd done their "debt" to society (having kids, having careers), they were now free to *really* pursue their own individual interests -- like gardening, painting, etc.

If you now do a search on the phrase "Women like us".. sigh...

The book got little to no attention when it came out. The book now seems to be buried...

27 posted on 07/11/2005 3:47:13 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jla; Mia T
Came back online just to say: Great title of that book. Whether or not the original flower children were peaceful or not is moot. The angry left is still using their "peaceful puppets" as a velvet glove. Just recently, protest in SF, marketed to be a peaceful protest, the group being used as cover for those with violence in mind (Ruckus, Anarchy Intnl). SF Police Officer badly wounded.

And all those training workshops to make puppets for their protests. Velvet glove.

You are both right; whether or not the original flowerpower group was genuinely "peaceful" is irrelevant. Newer "where's the love" groups are being used to hide violent behaviors.

I've yet to ever hear the NAACP make a single statement outside of aiding and abetting the LA Riot protestors, for example.

28 posted on 07/11/2005 4:03:37 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Alia
Found a book in 90s "Women Like Us" which seems to be no longer available. About the generation of women (Hillary's) starting at an all woman's college. (Used to have a copy, I thought it was so useful; kept lending it out to women; didn't get it back.)

Synopsis of the book: Women dreaming they could have it all, sans reality; just because they wanted it. Lives end up in ruins, they attend their college reunion.. and analogize that they indeed had it all. That now that they'd done their "debt" to society (having kids, having careers), they were now free to *really* pursue their own individual interests -- like gardening, painting, etc.

If you now do a search on the phrase "Women like us".. sigh...

The book got little to no attention when it came out. The book now seems to be buried...

 

Would that missus clinton opts for planting a bush instead of trying to supplant one.

29 posted on 07/11/2005 4:05:57 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jla; Alia

... in velvet gloves


30 posted on 07/11/2005 4:14:58 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


31 posted on 07/11/2005 4:35:19 AM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: Mia T
"Would that missus clinton opts for planting a bush instead of trying to supplant one."


Now that would require physical common labor, why plant when as Jezebel you can take, "judiciary"?
33 posted on 07/11/2005 4:46:17 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy; Alia; Pat The Postman; jla; All
If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

THE ALIENS
Mia T
June 9, 1999


 

34 posted on 07/11/2005 4:51:19 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

I know the woman who was President of the League of Women Voters in 1992; she moderated the Bush-clinton debates. I distinctly remember her gushing to me at the time about how wonderful the clintons are.... I strongly disagreed with her. The clintons' profound dysfunction was evident in 1992 to anyone who would open her eyes. This woman was a professor of political science and yet she bought the snake oil.... And on credit, no less.


35 posted on 07/11/2005 5:07:36 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thanks for the ping
peace
36 posted on 07/11/2005 5:23:03 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wingy

She is this century's genius!


37 posted on 07/11/2005 5:37:17 AM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jla

too may lezzies


38 posted on 07/11/2005 5:40:14 AM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
It's an excellent question.

I feel like I was able to cop onto the Clintons in early 1992 because our lives in college (1968-72) were so similar.

It takes one to know one, been there, done that, etc.

The Clintons obviously know their sheeple very, very well.

39 posted on 07/11/2005 5:43:06 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thanks for all that you do Mia T.

We the people have just recently gone from concept to reality. 62+ million life-loving, freedom-loving Americans are growing. Freedom is on the march. Anti-freedom criminals and their enablers are on the run. Bill & Hillary Criminal are history.

We the people are creating a more perfect union. It really is for our children and grandchildren and generations yet to be born.

Your analogies are appropriate.

Thanks for all that you do Mia T.

40 posted on 07/11/2005 5:43:17 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Would that missus clinton opts for planting a bush instead of trying to supplant one.

Nicely said, Mia.

;-)

41 posted on 07/11/2005 5:43:57 AM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pat The Postman; Mia T; joesnuffy

EXCELLENT


42 posted on 07/11/2005 5:46:03 AM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I know the woman who was President of the League of Women Voters in 1992; she moderated the Bush-clinton debates.

You should see what the Collier brothers had to say about 'The League of Women Voters' in the most excellent book, VOTESCAM.

The League of Women Voters (at least back decades ago) were just part of the corrupt machine in many parts of the country...... in line with the old Voters News Service.

43 posted on 07/11/2005 5:50:18 AM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I will still say that if you do not have a true God in your life, a person will look to human salvation. The choice for that human is either to follow one other human or pay God themselves. Hillary wants to play God.


44 posted on 07/11/2005 5:55:02 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Washington DC RINO Hunting Guide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble; Mia T
I feel like I was able to cop onto the Clintons in early 1992 because our lives in college (1968-72) were so similar.

Bill went to college a little earlier than that, more like my years in college (1964 - 1968). In fact when he was at Georgetown, Clinton was a dorm mate of my best friend. When I played baseball there in D.C. for my University, my buddy and Clinton would show up for the games.

You are so right about "It takes one to know one, been there, done that, etc." We understand the CON of the Clinton rap!

BTW, Clinton didn't really become a "hipster", alienated jerk until after his Georgetown days. Back then he just loved his Arkansas watermelons and laughed a lot.

45 posted on 07/11/2005 5:57:15 AM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: Baynative

bump


48 posted on 07/11/2005 6:48:45 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Pat The Postman
"I don't agree with Mia's comparisons"

So you don't agree that Hitlery is a lying, manipulative, opportunist that wishes to rule the US?

49 posted on 07/11/2005 6:50:11 AM PDT by subterfuge (Obama, momama...er Osama-Labamba, uh, bama...bananrama...URP!---Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
and really didn't think much of the whole hippie philosophy -BUT they liked the party, the flow of recreational drugs, and the eagerly easy hippie chicks who's first step of rebellion was letting their knickers down. ----------------- My guess is Clinton fit that stereotype exactly.

Boy, have you hit it on the nose!!!

I'd say at least 75% of the "hipsters" I knew in Pittsburgh from around 1967 through around 1974 were in it for the sex and drugs and were just spoiled generational *ssholes railing against THE ESTABLISHMENT............. I know was............. but I was smart enough even then to know that 'The Establishment' was a necessity, and that there had to be excellent, disciplined, responsible people who could 'run the trains' and build things quite well!

;-)

50 posted on 07/11/2005 7:29:26 AM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson