From what I read in
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/08/12/sept.11.hijackers.ap/index.html
, the reasons for not including the ABLE DANGER info was
1) information came from only one source
2) source had no documentation for claim
3) information did not mesh with accepted theory
Yet, on page 245 of their own report, they include the issue of Atta in Prague meeting with Iraqi intelligence. Here we have
1) a single source - Czech intel officer
2) no documentation - he reported what he saw
3) conflicting info - they believe Iraqi spook that denied it
So why would they have a lower standard for including the Iraqi meeting info than the ABLE DANGER info?
Weldon has several more from ABLE DANGER ready to come forward.
From my post on another thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461716/posts?page=16#16
Clinton came to Columbus, Ohio, in 1998, to sell a War in Iraq on a road show Town Hall meeting. What did he know, and why the sell job?