[LogicWings]

It is the anti-ID camp who want to assert the unprovable belief that intelligent intervention did NOT happen.

The Burden of Proof is upon those who make the assertion. I don't have to "Prove" ID is false because there is no evidence that it is true. None. It is a classic logical fallacy to say "This must be true because you haven't proven it false." This is an example of the woeful lack of logic in the ID community today. ID destroys science.

[Sloth]

It is a classic logical fallacy to say "This must be true because you haven't proven it false."

And who has asserted such a thing?