To: Gumlegs
But once we realize that evolution is simply "a process that results in heritable changes in a population spread over many generations"I narrowed it down to this last statement as the rest was so much wasted space. First, ("heritable changes in a population spread (whatever spread means) over many generations"); only describes an observation; therefore not a theory. Tacking on "a process" at the beginning doesn't get you any farther than you were before and fails the test of the Scientific Method.
W.K.
To: WhiteKnight
Why don't you describe what it is you want?
89 posted on
08/13/2005 7:35:33 PM PDT by
Gumlegs
To: All
I must leave you for the evening, to attend to the needs of
Darwin Central, which sees all, knows all, and controls all.
On behalf of the Grand Master, I am,
PatrickHenry
90 posted on
08/13/2005 7:35:45 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: WhiteKnight
...only describes an observation; therefore not a theory. Tacking on "a process" at the beginning doesn't get you any farther than you were before and fails the test of the Scientific Method. Oh please. You cannot assume that because a FReeper poster, however knowledgeable, does not write the definitive explanation of everything on every post, that omissions constitute an actual omission in the science itself.
91 posted on
08/13/2005 7:36:26 PM PDT by
js1138
(Science has it all: the fun of being still, paying attention, writing down numbers...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson