The Last Commissioner (Jamie Gorelick 9/11 Commission)

The American Thinker ^ | 8-12-05 | J. James Estrada

[Anti-Bubba182]

The Last Commissioner

"I have a very strong commitment to the facts, and I wanted very much to make sure the facts were all before us and they were appropriately understood."

The words of Jamie Gorelick, the tenth and last commissioner appointed to the 9/11 Commission.  She was

“one of the most active commissioners, interviewing dozens of current and former government officials and reading thousands of pages of documents.”

With that said, new information has come to light in recent days.  It seems that military intelligence was tracking Mohammed Atta and some of his fellow hijackers, as they entered the U.S. in 1999, obviously well before the 9/11 attacks. Unfortunately, this information was not presented to the FBI to pursue because of the “wall of separation” Gorelick built during her tenure in the Clinton Justice Department.  The wall, designed to protect Clinton in the China-gate fundraising scandal, prevented the CIA from communicating with domestic law enforcement agencies. 

Furthermore, the noble 9/11 panel denies getting this information in the course of its investigation.  Military officials say the 9/11 Commission staff was briefed on this crucial information in October 2003. 

Did the staff, as the Commissioners claim, fail to pass this crucial information on to them and leave it absent from the final report?  Not really.  It’s in the report, but it leaves out the names of Atta and the others.  From the 9/11 Commission report under the headline:

Introduction: Factual Overview of the September 11 Border Story

Three hijackers were known or knowable by intelligence authorities as al Qaeda terrorists in early 2000, but their biographical information was not fully developed and communicated to border authorities for watchlisting at U.S. consulates abroad (by the State Department) and at the border (by immigration and customs border inspectors).  The travel plans of all three also were known or knowable in 2000, in part because of cooperation from Arab and Asian country intelligence services and border authorities.

The information that Atta and the other were identified and tracked to these shores seems to have been altered (including the year).  Why?  Jamie Gorelick, a long time friend and confidant of Hillary Clinton, needs to prove that she has a “very strong commitment to the facts” by answering questions, instead of asking them.

J. James Estrada   8 12 05

[Anti-Bubba182]

"The information that Atta and the other were identified and tracked to these shores seems to have been altered (including the year). Why? Jamie Gorelick, a long time friend and confidant of Hillary Clinton, needs to prove that she has a “very strong commitment to the facts” by answering questions, instead of asking them.

Good point.

[Rider on the Rain]

I suspect Gore Lick's strong commitment is to covering up for Bubba and Butch and promoting their perverted marxist elitest agenda.

[randog]

1999, 2000, you say Att-a, I say Att-ah--hey, what's the big difference?

</Gore-lick>

[samadams2000]

For a little perspective:

George Washington would've had Gorelicker marched behind the barn.

[Rider on the Rain]

It works for me.

[drt1]

This all seems to support Berger's need to steal and destroy sensitive documents. Perhaps the real story is far more damaging to Clinton and his cohorts than even these sorry revelations are.

[EagleUSA]

The information that Atta and the other were identified and tracked to these shores seems to have been altered (including the year). Why? Jamie Gorelick, a long time friend and confidant of Hillary Clinton, needs to prove that she has a “very strong commitment to the facts” by answering questions, instead of asking them....
------
I think we have already figured this out. And it should be the end to Bonnie and Clyde... Now, who goes on the Grand Jury stand first, under oath, to answer questions???

[BusiDad]

This is not new information. It was available at the time of the 9/11 hearing. Part of the controversy is that this information wasn't discussed before the commission.

Those responsible for 9/11 simply can't keep there roles hidden any longer. Clinton, Gore, Gorelick, Reno... They all have alot to answer for.

[smoothsailing]

The article mentions the Gorelick "wall" was to protect Clinton in the China-gate fundraising scandal.

That's where any investigation of this should focus.To me that's the real story,not Atta.

[Rider on the Rain]

Perhaps the real story is far more damaging to Clinton and his cohorts than even these sorry revelations are.

I think you may be on to something. Bergler's actions were bizarre, but what if desperation demanded them?

[Reactionary]

Well. Here we have a case of a sitting American president being bought by an avowed enemy of America to the tune of millions. We have the illegal transfer of technology to the Chinese. We have the illegal seizure of 900 FBI files. We have the case of a legal wall being erected by the Justice Department to effectively shut down any investigation into illegal fundraising. And? We have the result being that thousands of Americans were murdered in cold blood because our intelligence services were prevented from sharing information with law enforcement because of legal barriers erected by the Clintons.

All of those are high crimes. And the Clintons? They are traitors to America and everything it represents.

[JennysCool]

but what if desperation demanded them?

I'm sure desperation demanded them. What other explanation is there?

[clintonh8r]

I suspect in her spare time Gore Lick was more of a Reno Lick....

[Rider on the Rain]

What other explanation is there?

Absolutely none that I can think of. I hope the chickens do finally come home to roost on the antics of these bastards.

[Rider on the Rain]

I suspect in her spare time Gore Lick was more of a Reno Lick....

I suspect you're right, her name not withstanding.

[STARWISE]

Gorelick 'MemoGate': It Just Got Worse

See post #280 for bottom line excerpt.

[Anti-Bubba182]

The gist of the Commission's claim is that they disregarded the information provided about Atta because he did not produce documentation.

Weldon was referring to "boxes of documentation". If this documentation is there the 9/11 commision, including Gorelick, has a lot of explaining to do.

[PGalt]

BTTT

[Sal]

The article mentions the Gorelick "wall" was to protect Clinton in the China-gate fundraising scandal.

Unlike the pathetically uninformed people who still get their info from the old media (which means they get NO info), informed people understand the wall was to protect the Clintons from the Chinagate treason. I used to think that 9/11 was an unfortunate side effect of that corruption.

However, there is one image I can't get out of my mind: the arrogant little prxck Podesta, almost drooling with glee, when he announced at the transition from Clintons to Bush that the Clintons had set up lots of "time bombs" for the new administration.

At the time I thought he meant the trashing of the WH, destruction of "W" keys on keyboards, etc. Now I'm beginning to wonder if three of those time bombs were delivered via 747s.

If that seems extreme, please tell me why, once you have accepted that Clintonistas like Gorelick facilitated the treason of transferring our national security to an enemy like Red China in return for illegal "campaign contributions", how is it a big leap to their facilitating a strike against our country by another (probably lesser) enemy like Al Qaeda?

[BARLF]

I think you have it reversed, Reno was window dressing only. Hubbell was first but he got chewed up right out of the gate do to his own criminal activity. So...no problem, Hillary moved Gorelick from DOD over to Justice to fill the Hubbell shoes.