Are you holding your breath waiting for that to happen?
what is amazing is the author quotes that with out any skepticism at all...problem is Bush is probably the weakest Domestic president Ive ever seen
I'm all for a smaller government, less spending and no new taxes but I (and the country) are not insane enough to think that Dean would deliver any of that.
"You know what we need in this country," Dean asked on Wednesday? "Individual liberty and personal responsibility."
Dean, of course, knows nothing of these things...if he did, he'd switch parties and not be such a clown.
This wouldn't have anything to do with the Department of Homeland Security would it? Maybe the Feds shouldn't have taken over airport security, but if you want to say President Bush has increased government spending and the size of government, at least admit where those increases are.
We all know that Dean is a whackjob, of course. However, there's no denying that Bush hasn't vetoed a single bill. Even excluding Homeland Security and military spending, he's still allowed the biggest increase in federal spending since fellow Texan LBJ.
Dean is trying to demoralize rank-and-file conservatives, hoping that they'll stay home in 2006.
-"You know what we need in this country," Dean asked on Wednesday?-
#1, did they really put a question mark there, and #2, what we need is fewer politicians.
-"You know what we need in this country," Dean asked on Wednesday?-
#1, did they really put a question mark there, and #2, what we need is fewer politicians.
So...Howard Dean is ripping Bush for signing a bill that had overwhelming Congressional support? Then he would rip Bush for not "listening to the elected representatives of the people".
I agree the bill is loaded with pork. ALL transportation bills have been loaded with pork since the days of Eisenhower.
Howard the Duck Dean is a blooming idiot for blasting the President over this bill, imho.
Have yet yet to hear from a no spending conscious State to reject acceptance of this Highway bill's monies.
The Dean appears willing to go would be to stipulate allocation by individual States of these "savings" towards reducing national debt.
Will Dr. Howard Dean live up to his oratory and make reducing debt instead building Highways his official priority when visiting blue States?
Between the House and Senate, the transportation bill received only 12 "no" votes.
And Bush should have seen his veto overturned, Why?
Are you holding your breath waiting for that to happen?
Heh-heh. The only reason Dean can get away with this is because he happily doubts that either will be a serious campaign issue. It's a free shot.
Persoanlly I'd rather spend billions on infrastructure than rat-hole it on the Great Society. The difference between Bush and Johnson is the difference betweeen a construction engineer and a social worker. We don't need any more social workers.
One thing about LBJ, he had b@lls.
Something Republicans could use.