I see a lot in the 9/11 report that is not disputed, such as:
"The FBI has gathered evidence indicating that Atta was in Virginia Beach on April 4 (as evidenced by a bank surveillance camera photo), and in Coral Springs, Florida on April 11, where he and Shehhi leased an apartment."
If you go to the link or just search the report, you will see that they provided documentation for these claims. Again, I'm not saying they are right. Just reporting what they said.
I did go to some of the links but didn't see that they provided actual phone records or videotape at the Bank. And the Slate article I linked says they don't have physical evidence to back up their claims.
One thing that we don't know, but it would be very helpful to know, is: What data did Able Danger use to finger Atta? And why does their time line not "mesh" with the Commission's?
Obviously, Able Danger claims that Atta entered the U.S. before June, 2001. Why? What information did they "mine" that led them to this conclusion?