To: Bob
It was a congressional staffer, who probably wouldn't have been a commission staffer.Opps. Sorry. Yes, That's what I meant.
It sounds like a threat, doesn't it?
26 posted on
08/14/2005 8:47:26 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
To: concerned about politics
In the article, I believe the Congressional staffer was reponding to the reports question of "Why didn't this Able member speak up earlier". The Staffer was implying that if the Able member did, it may affect his career negatively. The staffer was not threatening the person, he was actually answering for him.
27 posted on
08/14/2005 8:51:12 PM PDT by
NathanBookman
(Will this hurt Bush's re-election chances?)
To: concerned about politics
It sounds like a threat, doesn't it? Not really. I tend to agree with the post following yours that the staffer was answering for him rather than threatening him.
31 posted on
08/14/2005 9:01:31 PM PDT by
Bob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson