"Why does GWB continue to cover for the malfeasance of the Clinton administration?"
This is such an ignorant statement .. I hardly know where to begin .. so I won't!
If it is so ignorant, then why can it not be properly discussed? If the public, through the MSM, can demand hearings into September 11th resulting in the 9-11 Commission report, then how come, with the new evidence we are learning about the missed opportunities of the Clinton Administration can we not demand an investigation into this aspect of the story?
Fact is, terrorism existed before President Bush took office. Former President Clinton and his staff (the Burgler, Jaimie Gorelick, Janet Reno, et al.) knew about, but set up apparatus to avoid dealing with it. Why can we not expose this? Do you have an issue with the people's right to know?
By the way, why post a comment such as you did without addressing the issue? If you are too tired to deal with it, why post in the first place?
Just trying to help you budget your time.
It's both parties. Mostly the Dems, but remember, Bush stood there and went on and on about what a grrreat guy Tenet was, while I and multitudes of Americans screamed uselessly at our radios and TVs.
That's a microcosm of his whole approach to make nice with those communist bastards. It was naive at best.