Very interesting concept from a man whose concepts I have never agreed with. I must say I agree with him on this one. This is the same man who has formulated the lawsuits against the fast food industry and suits against the tobacco companies. He is dead on with this one. Just goes to show that there can sometimes be agreement among opposites. It is very ingenious to link the SCOTUS' ruling in the Michican Law school case a year or so ago,(The court held that the government may consider race if it is reasonably necessary to further a "compelling state interest.") to profiling. Is there an attorney out there who will take this case on? I wish Mr. Banzhaf would put as much effort n this as he did the fast food cases.
1 posted on
08/15/2005 6:43:14 PM PDT by
hophead
To: hophead
Yes - this idea is a wonderful way to rub the faces of the "affirmative action is necessary and Constitutional" crowd in the abomination that they have created. Turnabout being fair play, and all...
2 posted on
08/15/2005 6:49:43 PM PDT by
Zeppo
To: hophead
"Recently, it found that race could be considered in college admissions."
It goes both ways!!!! Ooops!
3 posted on
08/15/2005 6:50:29 PM PDT by
NathanBookman
(I'm a star, I'm a star. I am a big, bright, shining star.)
To: hophead
4 posted on
08/15/2005 7:22:56 PM PDT by
359Henrie
To: hophead
Aw, geez. ACLU in NY is going to be saddened, deeply saddened by this. Except that it's not news and they already know it!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson