Replies

if scientists created life through their controlled and contrived means, it would only serve to PROVE intelligent design.
In other words, intelligent design is unfalsifiable, and thus isn't science. QED

You so seem to misunderstand the idea of falsifiability, and why the evolutionists are so terrified. You see, proving evolution would falsify ID. In turn, the terror for evolutionists is that ID falsifies evolution.

The idea of "falsification" is one of those little issues of "proof" and that for a theory to be valid, there must also be invalid answers. Or in other words, proving evolution true would demonstrate that ID is not true, hence it is falsifiable. On the other hand, proving ID true, then evolution fails. THAT is the terror of evolutionists. Their religion is falling apart because the evidence of intelligent design is slowly mounting, the majority of support for evolution comes mostly from the ignorant who do not take the time to THINK THROUGH how silly evolution really is.

Evolutionists have built little "walls" around many of the things that destroy their precisou religious belief because it is a house of cards that is collapsing.

Evolution is no longer tenable, it is junk science or science fraud! As it is challenged, it is protected with almost fanatically zealous adherence by those who see their opiate fading...

Evolution is the opiate of the atheists. That is all it is and all it will ever be. It is an unsustainable secular fundamentalist religious belief.

"Or in other words, proving evolution true would demonstrate that ID is not true, hence it is falsifiable. On the other hand, proving ID true, then evolution fails. THAT is the terror of evolutionists."

NO theory has ever been proved true, as has been repeatedly been pointed out to you, so this example is junk.

As for a scientist creating life in the lab, it would only show he created life in a lab.

The hypothesis of ID is about the development of life on earth. NO evolutionary biologist is arguing that intelligence doesn't exist, or that intelligent beings (humans) can't design something. That doesn't in ANY mean that therefore an intelligent designer directed the history of life on earth. They have nothing to do with each other.

"Evolution is no longer tenable, it is junk science or science fraud! As it is challenged, it is protected with almost fanatically zealous adherence by those who see their opiate fading..."

That would be Creationism, not evolution.

Evolution is no longer tenable, it is junk science or science fraud!

Your repeated assertion of this doesn't make it any more true.

Feel free to provide some actual evidence to support your assertions anytime, though.