[hawkaw]

The professor is correct. There are facts that can be tested and observations made to confirm the hypothesis.

[UseYourHead]

Men die
Grass dies

Men are grass

[bluetone006]

"The professor is correct. There are facts that can be tested and observations made to confirm the hypothesis."

lol - and what would those be?

[highimpact]

The professor is correct. There are facts that can be tested and observations made to confirm the hypothesis.

Then why have we never seen one species evolve into another species? We can make comparisons - this fossil is similar to that fossil and that fossil came before the other fossil. We can observe cellular evolution - resistance to different bacterium and viruses and such, but no scientist has reproduced the two essential components that PROVE evolution to be fact:
1. the creation of a living organism from the non-living elements of life, and...
2. the evolution of one species into a completely different species.

The probability that simple, single-celled organisms formed accidentally out of a pool of prehistoric muck are so outrageously low that they are laughable. The probability that single-celled organisms evolved to possess all of the higher functions of mankind are equally remote.

[trebb]

The professor is correct. There are facts that can be tested and observations made to confirm the hypothesis.

Wouldn't that then make it "The Law of Evolution"?, which could then be used to make highly accurate predictions?