Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A fascinating new look at America before Columbus
The Charlotte Observer ^ | Aug. 14, 2005 | CHARLES MATTHEWS

Posted on 08/17/2005 11:43:12 AM PDT by Between the Lines

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last
To: Between the Lines

Population #s, as we point out in "A Patriot's History of the United States," are all over the map for 1491 North and Central America. NO ONE---and I repeat---NO ONE has any idea how many people were here. Recently, estimates have been lowered by as much as 50%, and increasingly they are finding bone evidence of so-called "European" diseases in the Indians before Columbus ever got here.


81 posted on 08/17/2005 1:54:17 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobbdobbs

You have to remember the Aztecs---by 1540 [!!]---still didn't have the wheel. Jared Diamond tries to excuse this in "Guns, Germs and Steel," by saying, "Well, they really didn't have the kinds of animals that required them to have the wheel." 1) Why not? 2) Why do you have to have animals before a wheel is useful? Indeed, it is reasonable to assume just the opposite is true---that the wheel made certain animals more useful.


82 posted on 08/17/2005 1:56:05 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
Like this takes away all the harm and pain of the past in their minds.

The pain of the past is far wider and deeper than just what happened to the native population of the Americas when Columbus arrived. There were so many deaths during various plagues in Europe that I've heard of contemporary accounts that talk about bandits jumping out from behind the piles of bodies. The United States is not unusual in that there are horrible things in it's past. What sets the United States apart is that we've learned to move past most of the sins of our past.

And given that none of my ancestors were even in the United States before 1885 and stayed on the East Coast, I don't feel any personal guilt, not that I think anyone should feel guilty for the crimes of another person, simply because they are related or, even more broadly, are simply members of the same race. If it turns out that the "Native Americans" wiped out an even earlier indiginous population of the Americas (as some recent archaeological finds suggest), all that does is show the absurdity of playing "holier than thou" games with ancestors.

83 posted on 08/17/2005 1:58:06 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: GaltMeister

Syphillis shows up in Europe shortly after 1492. The dominant hypothesis is that Columbus and his colleagues brought it back from the New World.


84 posted on 08/17/2005 1:58:58 PM PDT by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

Yes, disease was a major detrimental impact on the Aztecs. Hernando Cortez was another major detrimental impact on the Aztecs.


85 posted on 08/17/2005 2:01:47 PM PDT by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

I made it this far in reading the comments and this seemed like a good place to stop. Interesting post.

Back to work, Bump.


86 posted on 08/17/2005 2:02:30 PM PDT by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bagman

see post 9 and post 33.


87 posted on 08/17/2005 2:03:37 PM PDT by fish hawk (hollow points were made to hold pig lard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
I've seen hemispheric estimates of 100 million, which I think are wrong by a factor of at least 2, even if one accepts all of the theory. They rely heavily on large estimates for meso-america that just aren't supported by the footprints of the cities and sophistication of the agriculture of the time IMHO. Only a relatively small part of modern Mexico was settled by agriculturalists at the time. Those estimates derive in part from what appear to be exaggerations by Spanish missionaries who were harshly (and justifiably) critical of Spanish policy toward the Indians, but who seemed to have inflated their estimates to try to impact opinion and policy.

The only safe estimate it seems to me is somewhere between 5-50 million. That pins it down, doesn't it?

88 posted on 08/17/2005 2:05:34 PM PDT by colorado tanker (The People Have Spoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell
Not to mention cannibalism. Then again, those crazy eco-conscious Mesoamericans were only efficiently recycling organic protein.
89 posted on 08/17/2005 2:10:50 PM PDT by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

BTTT


90 posted on 08/17/2005 2:13:41 PM PDT by uglybiker (Did ya hear the one about the cannibal who passed his best friend in the forest?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
I just started collecting Native American artifacts last year. One thing we've learned is that there was not one square inch that wasn't touched in some way by the Indians, they were numerous. The Mimbres indians artifacts are about the most collected and people in this county have combed the countryside since the late 1800s for artifacts and you can still easily find them. In one year we have found over 100 arrowhead and numerous manos and metates.

At Chaco canyon in northern NM it seems from studies that they almost made the pinyon extinct in the time that were there.

There are many accounts of whites telling how barren and w/o wildlife the Southwest was as they were first explored. I know that in the portion of the SW I live in there would be very little wildlife w/o farmers and ranchers who provide the only available water much of the year.

91 posted on 08/17/2005 2:21:21 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Indians ate the horses? What do you mean?


92 posted on 08/17/2005 2:21:48 PM PDT by Unassuaged (I have shocking data relevant to the conversation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55
PS: Where did the Aztec's go? Disease? Did a white man visit them?

Exactly, the Mimbrenos, the Anasazi, too, many tribes disappeared long before the white man for white man's disease to be the problem. Did they starve? Did they assimilate? Who knows?

I do think there were a lot of them.

93 posted on 08/17/2005 2:25:21 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

That sounds like the theory in "Guns Germs and Steel".


94 posted on 08/17/2005 2:27:42 PM PDT by Unassuaged (I have shocking data relevant to the conversation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
The only safe estimate it seems to me is somewhere between 5-50 million. That pins it down, doesn't it?

I think 5 million is probably far too small, given the scale of the known cities in Central and South America. There'd have to be a substantial rural/agricultural population to feed the large urban population (Aztec cannibalism notwithstanding. ;-)

If your range is correct, I'd pin it toward the higher end...

95 posted on 08/17/2005 2:28:02 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: BTHOtu

Self-ping for later.


96 posted on 08/17/2005 2:29:57 PM PDT by BTHOtu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

I would too.


97 posted on 08/17/2005 2:30:25 PM PDT by colorado tanker (The People Have Spoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: LS
Why do you have to have animals before a wheel is useful? Indeed, it is reasonable to assume just the opposite is true---that the wheel made certain animals more useful.

In the middle east where the wheel was first invented about 3500 BC, it's use was later abandoned. The invention of the camel saddle about 500 BC allowed camels to be used as pack animals. In many ways, a camel with a pack was superior to a cart pulled by another beast of burden, and so the pack animal took the place of the wheel. The wheel did not find popular use in the middle east again until the crusades.

98 posted on 08/17/2005 2:34:08 PM PDT by Between the Lines (Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

He's from Stargate: SG-1. :)


99 posted on 08/17/2005 2:43:24 PM PDT by Rastus (How come you're so wrong, my sweet DemonRAT?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55
Good afternoon.
"Did a white man visit them?"

Actually several hundred did, under Cortez and Pedro de Alvarado and they effectively destroyed Aztec culture.

Ritual cannibalism using Spaniards who were carriers of smallpox may have played a part in the fall of the Aztecs.

Whatever the cause, fewer beating hearts were ripped from captive chests after the arrival of the Europeans.

Michael Frazier
100 posted on 08/17/2005 2:44:01 PM PDT by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson