Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to waste $80 million (liberal "think" group)
Armavirumque ^ | 17 August 2005 | James Piereson

Posted on 08/18/2005 11:10:46 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Lando

1 posted on 08/18/2005 11:10:46 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Re: "liberal and progressive groups"

Article failed to include union labor, like the SEIU and it's various Marxist organs.
2 posted on 08/18/2005 11:17:16 PM PDT by endthematrix ("an ominous vacancy"...I mean, JOHN ROBERTS now fills this space!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Lets hope, that this anti American effort has as much success as AIR AMERICA had.
3 posted on 08/18/2005 11:17:42 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

It helps when you actually have an argument supported by more than emotional whining. Liberals don't. Unfortunately, 50% of the country buys into emotional whining. I'll let the reader decide which 50%


4 posted on 08/18/2005 11:19:45 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Do you want to know how to make a small fortune? Start with a large one and vote democrat.


5 posted on 08/18/2005 11:25:25 PM PDT by bad company (when you hinder the war effort of one side, you help the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Its the liberal way... throw money at a "problem"... However much of the funding is from the federal gov't..


6 posted on 08/18/2005 11:27:13 PM PDT by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

What are they talking about? Conservative infrastructure?

Geez, I could've sworn the Conservatives were the ones without the infrastructure.


7 posted on 08/18/2005 11:35:27 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
Lets hope, that this anti American effort has as much success as AIR AMERICA had.

Yep, this is the latest liberal scam. I am reminded of the dog food story. First class company, lots of money, the best ingredients, super ad campaign, all for naught because the damn old dogs just wouldn't eat it.

When are the liberals going to learn that the American people just don't like what they are selling.

8 posted on 08/18/2005 11:37:45 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

This is absurd. I can't believe that 80 millionaires could be so stupid. What in the hell are the liberals going to do once they rent the building?


9 posted on 08/18/2005 11:39:12 PM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
When are the liberals going to learn that the American people just don't like what they are selling.

What? Nonsense. The problem is that their message just isn't getting out. ;o)
10 posted on 08/18/2005 11:41:55 PM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
Alpo ?
11 posted on 08/18/2005 11:44:40 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
" What? Nonsense. The problem is that their message just isn't getting out. ;o) " .. let's hope that is sarcasm,, right ?
In the liberals case, as in , the old saying " don't blame the messenger for the message " ... but, in the liberals case, blame the message and the messenger.
12 posted on 08/18/2005 11:48:06 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Excellent!


13 posted on 08/18/2005 11:55:39 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
The rise of alternative television networks and newspapers has now rendered these tactics hopelessly ineffective. Now no one (except unfortunate college students) is required to pay any attention at all to the liberals. And most do not.

This is the only part of the column that falls down. "Alternative television networks and newspapers"?? Certainly 24-hour cable TV news (Fox News, Cspan) has been critical, but Rush Limbaugh (talk radio) and the internet MUST be mentioned here.

14 posted on 08/18/2005 11:59:33 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
What are they talking about? Conservative infrastructure?

Ideas that make sense to normal, traditional American families.
That's the "conservative infrastructure".

Last I heard, the Democrats were "trying to figure out what our core values are" (Senator Barak Obama) and hiring a professional linguistics dude to teach them how to lie better. The Democrats have also decided that they need to swallow hard and learn to fake the religion thing.

15 posted on 08/19/2005 12:05:24 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

The liberal program writ large since the sixties has been a disaster. But liberals don't think that. They think they've had huge successes culminating with the Clinton years who of course enacted a number of successful laws that were originated by conservatives (welfare reform, tax reform) ...because The Great Fornicator knew that liberalism is bunk but couldn't admit it for obvious reasons. They think the only reason their programs aren't more successful is because stingy conservatives cut the money supply or killed their "successful" programs. Even after liberal program after liberal program was proven to be a disaster, they still believe in liberalism. Results don't matter to libs, only intentions.


16 posted on 08/19/2005 12:41:43 AM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Think tank? I'd call it a sewage treatment facility.


17 posted on 08/19/2005 12:49:49 AM PDT by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Ah... I've a term for that, "The Conspiracy of the Common Sense", which is why the Right Wing appears to have a Vast Conspiracy...


18 posted on 08/19/2005 1:21:43 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: driftless
successes culminating with the Clinton years who of course enacted a number of successful laws that were originated by conservatives (welfare reform, tax reform)

Welfare reform was signed by Clinton (even if it was watered down), but "tax reform"? Not during Clinton. The only thing we got from Clinton (who was elected in part on his lie to support "middle class tax cuts") was the largest tax hike in history.

It was Dubya who came along and cut taxes. That's why tax revenues to the federal government are now soaring, the deficit is coming down fast, and the economy is chugging along better than ever.

19 posted on 08/19/2005 1:50:44 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Apparently he did sign some kind of reform bill that allowed home sellers to not be taxed up to 500 grand on profits from selling their homes. Market analysts said that that has played a large part in the housing boom. Even Sean Hannity and a few other conservatives on NRO have mentioned that. I don't give Clinton much credit for too many things, but we have to give credit where credit is due. His biggest failures were in the areas of national security as is being currently proved. He was lucky in Bosnia, but that didn't involve national security. Ultimately Clinton was the luckiest and shrewdest pol I've ever seen. But his overall grade is in the minus category even if we disregard the Lewinsky scandal.


20 posted on 08/19/2005 2:14:42 AM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson