I don't think the TOE is bad, wrong nor should it be suppressed. I think the TOE is the POE, that it doesn't hold water as a true scientific theory and is more of a philosophy, well on its way to becoming a religion.
Let's get back to your original reply....
I can just picture an (evo) "teacher" nodding his/her head and saying "Absolutely" when a student asks, "Does that mean (one race is superior to another?" or "Does that mean Social Darwinism is true?")
And once again my response to this...."Disingenuous. Darwin made no such claim."
You're response to this....It doesn't matter that Darwin made no such claim, the evo teachers make the claim for him.
Please define "evo teacher".
Please define "evo teacher".
***I was plugging & chugging, substituting back into your statement. I suppose I should have been more accurate and said something like evo-biased teacher. Sorry about that. For purposes of policy discussion, let's just substitute PWTDFE there. Was there some kind of point you wanted to make?