Could be but it is all very weird, and the way the Committee handled the information was weird (I don't believe the Committee was out to whitewash Clinton). Maybe the book on Atta was more in the nature of speculation, but the suggestion that there is no proof these two officers fingered Atta at all, and maybe they just have faulty memories, is very strange. Where is the friggin paper trail, which the Committee denies it never saw? Hopefully there will be committee hearings, and all the players can chat about it under oath.
Something very strange is amiss amigo. Two career officers telling the same story and no paper trail at all. It spells COVERUP!