Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Crackingham; HiJinx; gubamyster
According to analysts, Garza's remark probably achieved its purpose. Because Mexico and the United States are so politically and economically enmeshed, withdrawing an ambassador or enacting some kind of sanction would be harsher measures than the U.S. government wanted to take. At the same time, the border violence to which Garza responded is of deep concern here. American officials are pressing for Mexico's federal government to actively pursue border kingpins and narco-traffickers' safe houses, but in Nuevo Laredo at least, the murder rate has actually increased since federal intervention two months ago.

Good for Garza! The Mexican government can whine all they want. Garza did the right thing.

8 posted on 08/22/2005 6:46:59 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl ("President Bush, start building that wall"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheSpottedOwl
This is still just talk. I say let the Mexicans put it vote. Let them become another 31 states in The U.S.
9 posted on 08/22/2005 6:59:48 PM PDT by one more state
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TheSpottedOwl

Mexico needs tourist dollars for those who do not come to the USA.

If the violence issue gets more MSM airplay, Mexican tourism is screwed.


10 posted on 08/22/2005 7:06:10 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson