Posted on 08/23/2005 1:48:17 PM PDT by BenLurkin
Well then, back to my original question. :o)
" Those comments enraged Sheehan supporter Dee Ann Heath, who said she has two sons serving in Iraq and another preparing to leave.
"I don't support the war, but I support my sons," she said. "I simply want them to come home."
If her sons are sent to Afghanistan, Korea or Bosnia, etc- I bet her views would be the same.
" I support the military, as long as my sons stay stateside. "
The prefer life, unless a fetus is the question.
They don't care if a peace us under the heels of a tyrant who filled over 200 mass graves, as Saddam did.
Arm the front HUMVEE with twin .50's and mow down every antiwar demonstrator you see.
No, I would instead arm it with a gun firing soap-and-water...more hazardous to the average peacenik than bullets!
Arm the front HUMVEE with twin .50's and mow down every antiwar demonstrator you see.
No, I would instead arm it with a gun firing soap-and-water...more hazardous to the average peacenik than bullets!
It's interesting that the reporter ties these anti-Sheehan protesters to Bush. Judging from their chants, it looks more like they are backing the War than the President.
Does anyone who was around in the 60's remember anti-War protesters being confronted on the street by pro-War protesters?
That works for me.
Well said, you get it, I get it, but people like Dee Ann
Heath will never get it. The enemy is counting on nit-wits
like her.
Off your game today, my boy, off your game.
Funny, I was thinking about this last night as I watched local news (talking about cindyloon)just after watching 911 on National Geographic. I do not remember anybody confronting the VN war protesters.
I would be though, if there were counter-protests, the MSM never got the word out! Glad the internet has made the times change.
Not likely. The anti-American crowd is, and always will be anti-American. It doesn't matter who the enemy is -- they will aid and abet them.
That is excluding the utterly duped people of course. As for them we can only hope they see the light -- and soon.
Lord would I love to get the chance to do that.
No, I am just so ON my game that you're not seeing it.
(Mysterious, confident grin)
That is one reason why the war on terror is NOT another Vietnam.
Ahem. I was around in the 60's. Groups that attacked anti-war protesters were the police, National Guard, construction workers and the Hell's Angels.
The police were the best at non-lethal attacks. Construction workers and Hell's Angels just didn't have the discipline to keep at it block after block.
Of course these groups couldn't exactly be described as pro-war. More like anti-street scum.
Does anyone who was around in the 60's
I am no where near CIndy's ditch.
I do detect the smell of moth balls.
'Sweatin to the Oldies'
Confidence noted. : )
It's war only when the U.S. fights back.
It's OK if U.S. "imperialists" are attacked and killed. That's not war. That's the world sending us a message that we should try to understand them; or, perhaps, it's "oppressed" people trying to get liberation from our allies such as in Viet Nam. I guess.
Never during the last century or this have the "anti-war" crowd protested against any country but the U.S. Go figure.
The one time when there was no "anti-war" from America's left? When Germany's National Socialists attacked the American left's Uncle Joe's socialist workers' paradise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.