Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quietolong
At issue is whether Malcolm Incorporated can keep its 132-foot flag pole outside a building that it owns north of Eau Claire or whether it must lower the pole 14 feet to comply with some airport zoning regulations.

I don't think airports have the authority to make zoning regs - that is a city plannng commission's responsibility. If the taller flag pole constitutes an airspace obstruction, then it is a safety issue, and the flag pole has to be lowered.

2 posted on 08/24/2005 12:22:37 AM PDT by DeeOhGee (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DeeOhGee

I've seen the large flag and it's impressive. The 132 ft. pole is not going to be a safety factor for any airplane coming in or out of Eau Claire or Chippewa Falls.


4 posted on 08/24/2005 6:18:16 AM PDT by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson