Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Singermom

Huh? The cotton gin didn't pick the cotton. The cotton gin separates the seeds and their hull from the fibers. Slaves still picked cotton 60-70 years after the invention of the cotton gin.


7 posted on 08/24/2005 12:55:46 PM PDT by xrp (Fox News: I wonder if Greta will cover Aruba Missing Teen for all eternity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xrp
I had some cotton gin once.

It was soft and smooth going down, but kinda' got stuck in my throat.

Also, it doesn't really mix well with tonic water.

20 posted on 08/24/2005 1:20:31 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: xrp

The point is machines would be invented to do much of the work Illegal Immigrants do if it was necessary. (And farmers would invest in these machines and use them if they didn't have Illegal Immigrants to exploit.)

For example: Many trees are now shaken to release the friut instead of having people pick each fruit from the tree.


22 posted on 08/24/2005 1:38:16 PM PDT by Singermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: xrp

Being the product of a long line of farmers I can concur that the lack of human labor has always boosted the invention and use of machines to do the work.

Many Central Valley producers have not mechanized because cheep labor was available.

You are right about the cotton gin but mechanical harvesters did come along when finally the labor dried up or became too expensive.


48 posted on 08/24/2005 3:20:12 PM PDT by mercy (never again a patsy for Bill Gates - spyware and viri free for over TWO YEARS now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson