Posted on 08/25/2005 3:30:57 AM PDT by Former Military Chick
ARLINGTON, Va. - Unlike earlier wars, nearly all Arlington National Cemetery gravestones for troops killed in Iraq or Afghanistan are inscribed with the slogan-like operation names the Pentagon selected to promote public support for the conflicts.
Families of fallen soldiers and Marines are being told they have the option to have the government-furnished headstones engraved with "Operation Enduring Freedom" or "Operation Iraqi Freedom" at no extra charge, whether they are buried in Arlington or elsewhere. A mock-up shown to many families includes the operation names.
The vast majority of military gravestones from other eras are inscribed with just the basic, required information: name, rank, military branch, date of death and, if applicable, the war and foreign country in which the person served.
Families are supposed to have final approval over what goes on the tombstones. That hasn't always happened.
Nadia and Robert McCaffrey, whose son Patrick was killed in Iraq in June 2004, said "Operation Iraqi Freedom" ended up on his government-supplied headstone in Oceanside, Calif., without family approval.
"I was a little taken aback," Robert McCaffrey said, describing his reaction when he first saw the operation name on Patrick's tombstone. "They certainly didn't ask my wife; they didn't ask me." He said Patrick's widow told him she had not been asked either.
"In one way, I feel it's taking advantage to a small degree," McCaffrey said. "Patrick did not want to be there, that is a definite fact."
The owner of the company that has been making gravestones for Arlington and other national cemeteries for nearly two decades is uncomfortable, too.
"It just seems a little brazen that that's put on stones," said Jeff Martell, owner of Granite Industries of Vermont. "It seems like it might be connected to politics."
The Department of Veterans Affairs says it isn't. "The headstone is not a PR purpose. It is to let the country know and the people that visit the cemetery know who served this country and made the country free for us," VA official Steve Muro said.
Since 1997, the government has been paying for virtually everything inscribed on the gravestones. Before that, families had to pay the gravestone makers separately for any inscription beyond the basics.
It wasn't until the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 that the department instructed national cemetery directors and funeral homes across the country to advise families of fallen soldiers and Marines that they could have operation names like "Enduring Freedom" or "Iraqi Freedom" included on the headstones.
VA officials say neither the Pentagon nor White House exerted any pressure to get families to include the operation names. They say families always had the option of including information like battle or operation names, but didn't always know it.
"It's just the right thing to do and it always has been, but it hasn't always been followed," said Dave Schettler, director of the VA's memorial programs service.
VA officials say they don't know how many families of the more than 2,000 soldiers and Marines who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan have opted to include the operation names.
At Arlington, the nation's most prestigious national cemetery, all but a few of the 193 gravestones of Iraq and Afghanistan dead carry the operation names. War casualties are also buried in many of the 121 other national cemeteries and numerous state and private graveyards.
The interment service supervisor at Arlington, Vicki Tanner, said cemetery representatives show families a mock-up of the headstone with "Operation Iraqi Freedom" or "Operation Enduring Freedom" already included, and ask their approval.
Former Sen. Max Cleland, D-Ga., who lost both legs and an arm in Vietnam and headed the Veterans Administration under President Carter, called the practice "a little bit of glorified advertising."
"I think it's a little bit of gilding the lily," Cleland said, while insisting that he's not criticizing families who want that information included.
"Most of the headstones out there at Arlington and around the nation just say World War II or Korea or Vietnam, one simple statement," he said. "It's not, shall we say, a designated theme or a designated operation by somebody in the Pentagon. It is what it is. And I think there's power in simplicity."
The Pentagon in the late 1980s began selecting operation names with themes that would help generate public support for conflicts.
Gregory C. Sieminski, an Army officer writing in a 1995 Army War College publication, said the Pentagon decision to call the 1989 invasion of Panama "Operation Just Cause" initiated a trend of naming operations "with an eye toward shaping domestic and international perceptions about the activities they describe."
Mainline veterans groups are taking the change in stride. American Legion spokesman Donald Mooney said the organization hasn't heard any complaints from its members.
"I'm concerned that we do what the families want," said Bob Wallace, executive director of Veterans of Foreign Wars. "I don't think there's any critical motivation behind this."
"I was a little taken aback," Robert McCaffrey said, describing his reaction when he first saw the operation name on Patrick's tombstone. "They certainly didn't ask my wife; they didn't ask me." He said Patrick's widow told him she had not been asked either.
"In one way, I feel it's taking advantage to a small degree," McCaffrey said. "Patrick did not want to be there, that is a definite fact."
Is it me, or are their more of these type of sentences injected into current military articles?
Notice the "other eras" and "war and foreign county" in the third paragraph.
No change in policy that I see.
Just an other military hit piece.
If Iraq turns out to be an islamo-facist terror state, will the government buy new headstones?
Probably only you since we know how much the MSM is behind the troops and for the war. (s/)
"An accident at 4th and Main was caused by a distracted driver, obviously concerned about the quagmire in Iraq."
The Associated Press is an instrument of the Devil. Seriously.
I'm sure of it and I don't always believe that such quotes are real.
I mean that. how many family members are going to go out and have an AP story corrected, and if they do where do all the corrections go, the web log of lost mainstream media corrections?
This article makes no real sense at all, would families protest if their lost ones were listed on the wall, or on the WWII Memorial or even a flagpole in a park?
Of course not but having the operation where their lost one died engraved on a government supplied tombstone is bad?
Someone is being used, but not by our government.
This article is not surprising. Hardcore liberals and mainstream "journalists" often say they support the troops, but the truth is they loathe the military.
This is absurd. I think it should be routine to put on a gravestone the action in which a soldier/sailor/marine/airman was killed. Duh!
AP BS!
Max lost his limbs in "Operation f'ing around with explosives"; I can see his concern with the practice.
Someone already posted this article, but as I said in the other thread, OEF/OIF are not slogans! They are the names of the operations. It is not uncommon for the tombstones of soldiers who fought in previous wars to be marked with "WWII" "Korea" or "Vietnam." I have the feeling that the America bashing press in this case wants to leave the impression that the Pentagon is putting "Let's Roll!" or "Bring it on!" on the tombstones.
It's standard procedure to include the combat in which the soldier was involved, so far as I know. Even people who weren't killed in the combat will have "Korea" or "Vietnam," etc. on their headstones, if they get a VA headstone.
"Operation Iraqi Freedom" was not a slogan, but the name of the combat (since it was not declared as a war) in which the military person in question served.
The left never rests, does it.
Ah, you beat me to the punch!
I make it a policy not to make fun of cripples (since I am one too). However, ole Max sure pushes the envelope.
I had mixed emotions when I clicked "post", but the press loves to qualify any of Cleland's statements with the fact that he lost his limbs "in Vietnam". My beef is more with his lionization in the media than with Max himself.
Right! He has become the left's poster boy to ease their guilt about their anti-war activities. He is exploited rather than an exploiter. I would have loved to hear what he really thought of Kerry. I just don't know many Nam Vets who believed Kerry to be genuine. War heros just don't act like that.
If the Pentagon didn't put anything on the tombstones, the media would say it is because the Bush administration doesn't want invite criticism about the quagmire.
So what has changed? A serviceman killed overseas during World War II has that fact noted on his gravestone; a serviceman killed in Operation Iraqi Freedom will have that noted on his gravestone. I do not see the difference.
So . . . fallen veterans of previous wars had the name of the war printed on their tombstones, and so do today's heroes. I don't see the problem here.
I'm sure the libs at the AP would rather the tombstomes say "Bush's War" or "Halliburton."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.