"Nurse! I'm hearing the voices of the Antis in my head again!"
Do you not want to talk about the American Independent Party? Why not? It's just your typical whacko third party losers.
You feel free to attack the Republican Party, now it's pay back time.
All of the anti-illegals who have been claiming on FR to be Republicans are going to have to come out from under their rocks now and expose themselves for what they really are.
See post #42. Look at the name Jim Gilchrist and next to it you will see that he is running for the nomination of the American Independent Party.
You may not like it but you and the other antis have been outed.
You are strectching here and trying to paint people with stripes they do not deserve.
As to Gilchrist, like I told Torie, what I have heard of him tells me he is a conservative who upholds and supports our constitution. I agree with what I have seen and heard of his anti-illegal entry efforts. I see that he is pro-life, pro-second amendment, and supports the completion of the mission in Iraq (despite having apparently opposed us going in). I will wait to hear more on othert specific issues and make up my own mind.
(Responding to a post by tertiary01:
"Since you have so much compassion for Illegal Mexican immigrants")
(bayourod responds:)
Not me. As I've posted before, I have no affinity for Mexicans or Americans of Hispanic descent.
To recognize that foreign laborers are essential right now to sustaining our economy does not mean that I am particularly fond of Hispanics.
I don't speak Spanish, have Hispanic relatives, work with Hispanic or have any close Hispanic friends.
To recognize that fences cannot stop men willing to risk their lives to feed their families does not mean that I like those men. It just means that I understand the nature of the problem.
If I had my personal preference, instead of Mexican laborers, we would have Western European laborers with blond hair and blue eyes pouring across our borders bringing their beautiful daughters. But that isn't reality. Neither is "sealing the border".
To recognize that Republicans must not unnecessarily alienate Hispanic voters with gratuitous insults if we hope to keep Hillary out of the White House is not the same as saying that I want to invite them to live in my house.
However all my relations with Hispanics have been good. Can't say that about Nigerians and half a dozen other types.
Oh please, do go on about how much other people's racism offends you. Your righteous indignance shines like a beacon, leading the way to true enlightenment.
Care to explain what issue you have with "Nigerians and half a dozen other types"? Because it sure sounds racist, although you probably have a perfectly logical explanation as to what you actually meant.
Should we take this to mean that you are admitting to being pro-illegal immigration? I've asked you this question several times. Why do you refuse to answer this question?
"Nurse! I'm hearing the voices of the Antis in my head again!"
You have already stated your viotrolic hatred of Tancredo, so we know you will NOT support the 2006 Republican slate in Colorado , so why do you refuse to tell us which fringe third party wacko you will support?
Has your boss Harry Browne not supplied the marching orders yet?
You and other PRO-ILLEGAL alien huggers call yourselves "Republicans" while you work endlessly to defeat a lifelong Republican Congressman from Colorado.
YOUR position on immigration is not anything close to where the REPUBLICAN Party had stood on that issue for the last 130 years.
There are several parties that share YOUR views on immigration, NONE of which (Libertarians, Greens, Socialists) are remotely Republican.
For instance: “We condemn the U.S. government's policy of barring those refugees from our country and preventing Americans from assisting their passage to help them escape tyranny or improve their economic prospects…We hold that human rights should not be denied or abridged on the basis of nationality. Undocumented non-citizens should not be denied the fundamental freedom to labor and to move about unmolested. Furthermore, immigration must not be restricted for reasons of race, religion, political creed, age or sexual preference…. We condemn massive roundups of Hispanic Americans and others by the federal government in its hunt for individuals not possessing required government documents. We strongly oppose all measures that punish employers who hire undocumented workers. Such measures repress free enterprise, harass workers, and systematically discourage employers from hiring Hispanics.”
--- 2004 Libertarian Party platform
(SOURCE: http://www.lp.org/issues/platform_all.shtml#immigrat)
You may not like it, but you and the other liberal illegal alien huggers on this forum have been outed.
When will you announce which NON-REPUBLICAN you support for Congress in Colorado's sixth district?
And what would that be, exactly? Don't hold back.
" You may not like it but you and the other antis have been outed."
And YOU have been outed as well. The post below may explain why you are so interested in open borders:
I had acquaintances who flew drugs in from Cancun by private jet. They'd stop in Cuba for refueling and bring back cigars. I ran into the DA one night when we were both smoking the same type.
10 posted on 02/05/2005 10:45:26 PM PST by bayourod
BTW, no one should forget your racist post:
if I had my personal preference, instead of Mexican laborers, we would have Western European laborers with blond hair and blue eyes pouring across our borders bringing their beautiful daughters. But that isn't reality. Neither is "sealing the border".
To recognize that Republicans must not unnecessarily alienate Hispanic voters with gratuitous insults if we hope to keep Hillary out of the White House is not the same as saying that I want to invite them to live in my house.
However all my relations with Hispanics have been good. Can't say that about Nigerians and half a dozen other types.
72 posted on 07/24/2005 3:47:25 PM CDT by bayourod