Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: infowarrior; Joann37

Sorry, IW. As much as we'd LIKE al to be held responsible, he's got no criminal liability. And there are no injured parties to bring a civil suit. See #172-174, etc.


178 posted on 08/29/2005 10:50:07 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: sam_paine
Sorry, IW. As much as we'd LIKE al to be held responsible, he's got no criminal liability.

I suppose you're correct, and it would be difficult to prove legally at any rate. I would like to see him held accountable, but there are a lot of things in life, I'd like to see yet never will...

the infowarrior

194 posted on 08/29/2005 11:51:13 PM PDT by infowarrior (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson