Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross
But did she setup the wall, or modify it somehow, making it less useful.

If the latter, then we would be rebuffed once more when we claimed she created that wall. When pushed, the 'Rats would come back with another "but the wall was already there".

If the 'Rats can rebuff enough claims, then the force of further claims is weakened. We are dealing with smart lawyers here. They are playing chess here, not checkers. They will seek to take positions that will invite us to respond in ways they know they can rebutt.

And we are playing in the court of public opinion, with a main stream media that is heavily biased against us presenting our case.

I hope Congressman Weldon is good, as well as tenacious.

958 posted on 09/01/2005 12:58:44 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 957 | View Replies ]


To: ThePythonicCow
But did she setup the wall, or modify it somehow, making it less useful.

By definition, a wall is a BARRIER. And it was ANTI-useful to U.S. national security. While protective of the "liberties" of our foreign enemies who merely happened to already be on our shores.

963 posted on 09/03/2005 4:23:11 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Definition of strict constructionist: someone who DOESN'T hallucinate when reading the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson