Why? Because evolution is a premise, a worldview, and defining characteristic of the egos of its adherents, and nothing which even rises to the level of a credible scientific hypothesis at all.
It's adherents -- most notably the liberal-Leftist academics, and a few of the phony pretenders to conservatism we see often enough on the "crevo" threads -- pursue what they falsely call "science" as a tool for advancement of their larded assumptions, mostly devoid of credible fact, as this scientific mainstream published article discusses. Some peddle the evo-pap to a gullible, fawning, and uncritical MSM, only to be fashionably parroted by their unthinking acolytes and secondary education establishment, all for purposes of their own aggrandizement and self-promotion, if not for purposes of just basic gov't grant welfare queening.
It is also why so many of the aforementioned liberals and "pretenders" on FRs threads readily admit about themselves and their "evo-community" that what "science" they do do is divorced from an inherent search for truth. Are we surprised that such an ego-polluted philosophical approach to science leads to selective reporting of data, and other blatant falsehoods masquerading as science?
True conservatism promotes the search for truth. Liberalism, by contrast willfully obscures the truth.
A short history lesson is in order. Our Founders recognized the Creator of the universe and the inalienable rights America enjoys, which proceed from Him. By contrast the Soviet Union, Hitler's Germany, and today's abortionists put into practice their own versions of the social Darwinist's application of "survival of the fittest," and selection of what the likes of Margaret Sanger, Darwin himself and his philosophical compatriot, Huxley, termed, The "Favored" Races. Sadly, we reflect upon the exterminations and genocides of the "unfavored," all accomplished under the color of evolutionary "science."
Oh sure, the libs and pretenders to conservatism recoil in horror, and seethe with indignation at any direct correlation drawn to the inevitable outworking of their evolutionary worldview and with horrors embodied in examples of the greatest humanly-devised tragedies the world has ever seen. Such tragedies are just an example of what happens in the moral void left by the corruption of scientific thought by those who no longer pursue science in the search for truth.
History reports. You decide. I'll leave it to the reader to determine who holds the true conservative and moral high ground in the Creation-Evolution debates.
A small reminder to all you liberals and pretenders to conservatism out there: Intelligent Design is ascendant. To the orthodox evolutionist it may be blasphemy, but the intellectually honest in the scientific community are leading the Reformation and a renewal of scientific inquiry founded in the pursuit of truth, even as more "peer reviewed" fraud, scientific groupthink, and scientific carelessness is exposed for what it is and always has been. Materialists might want to get on board, before you all look more ridiculous than your materialist's position already does. And as Rush Limbaugh so aptly puts it in terms of true conservatism: "We are winning!"
BUMP!
Good essay. (Mind your apostrophes!)
That is a really clueless post.
It's just full of ad hom attacks with no substance.
Here let me do the same thing (we'll see how you like it):
[sarc]
Intelligent Design says that life changes through intelligent guidance and selection. This is exactly what inspired Hitler and Eugenics, neither of which can occur without intelligent intervention. Eugenics of course is an example of microevolution, something the creationists and IDiots are keen to support. Also the soviet union was opposed to Darwinian evolution and executed those biologists that supported it. Seems the ID poition is one that communists espouse! Therefore we can clearly see that creationists and IDiots are not true conservatives.
[/sarc]
Oh yes and even ID says we came share common ancestory with chimpanzees - perhaps you didn't know that.