Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SpinyNorman; CasearianDaoist; headsonpikes; beyond the sea; E.G.C.; Military family member; ...
If they simply presented unbiased, objective and factual reporting, they wouldn't be in the mess they are in, and wouldn't need a "nonbudsman." They just need a fact checker and honest reporters, not liberal hacks like Rather and Mapes.
I don't think you understand the situation. The fundamental problem is story selection - what is the lead, what makes the cut, and what isn't reported at all. Considering would the "memos" have logically been important even if they were absolutely genuine? Would it have been "objective" to call them a smoking gun, when all they putatively "prove" is that Bush wasn't the second coming of Audie Murphy - something which Bush himself never claimed?

I'm not arguing that they wouldn't have likely suppressed the Bush vote enough to turn the election if the blogosphere and talk radio hadn't put the kibosh on them - I think they probably would. But that begs the question - why would an objective person think it was their job to promote the Kerry political line?

Just turn it around. Suppose that there was information about Kerry that was exactly as derrogatory as those "memos," but it was about John Kerry. Would CBS have aired it, and would it have affected the election? That's not a hypothetical question, of course - the answer is the book Unfit for Command by O'Neil and the other members of the "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth." If 60 Minutes had breathlessly touted it they way they did the "memos," there would have been no doubt at all as to the outcome of the election. Instead CBS and the rest of the "objective" journalists pretended to give SBVT a hearing, then announced that they had been "discredited." And even so, SBVT is credited with the defeat of Kerry in Ohio.

The idea of "objectivity" is absurd when story selection determines the political slant of your reporting. Which is why the First Amendment is so elegant - and why the government was wrong to create the "titles of nobility" known as broadcast licenses.

Cindy Sheehan, Rush Limbaugh, and CBS
August 22, 2005 | conservatism_IS_compassion


11 posted on 08/31/2005 3:08:15 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Media bias bump.


12 posted on 08/31/2005 3:08:43 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

CBS: We decide. We report. You listen.


15 posted on 08/31/2005 6:23:40 AM PDT by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

To bolster your comments, there was an active rumor that Kerry was dishonorably dicharged from the Navy for his political actions while still in the Navy Reserves. He promised to sign the papers to release all his military records but never did. The MSM gave him a pass with hardly a whisper.


16 posted on 08/31/2005 8:21:11 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
I have no doubt cbs will get to the bottom of things at their network. Another "inside" job...

FGS

19 posted on 08/31/2005 6:02:15 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson