Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeorgiaDawg32
Attempting to change nature usually invokes the "Law of Unintended Consequences". Although it may seem fine at the time, the consequences of such a diversion would produce consequences not thought of that may or may not (as is usually the case) be good.

I think we just had the unintended consequence. I may be wrong but I think the Mississippi would be using the Atchafalaya today if not for the dams and canals the Corps of Engineers control to kepp it on its present course.

23 posted on 08/31/2005 5:25:16 PM PDT by centexan (Go 1st Cav and 4th ID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: centexan
"I may be wrong but I think the Mississippi would be using the Atchafalaya today if not for the dams and canals the Corps of Engineers control to keep it on its present course."

I believe this is correct. The Mississippi would prefer the shorter course to the sea. And the reason for diverting water from the cut off was was to ensure that it did not leave New Orleans as a dead port city stranded on a stinking scum choked cut off oxbow.
29 posted on 08/31/2005 5:39:28 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson