Ten Year Old, Arrested for Giving Food to Terri Schiavo, Apologizes

LifeSite ^ | August 31, 2005

[SALChamps03]

You do that.

[SALChamps03]

Nope. I made my own mind up about this. I don't listen to the MSM. My news consists of Hannity and Colmes, Sean Hannity's radio show, Fox News, Free Republic, Townhall.com, Drudge, Rushlimbaugh.com, Neal Boortz, etc. Those are hardly mainstream media. Look, I've accepted the fact that you disagree with me. Why don't you do likewise? We don't agree. There are greater tragedies in the world than disagreement.

[Wampus SC]

"Because I disagree with your point of view does not make me a liberal."

That's correct. It is not the disagreement that makes you a liberal.

[Wampus SC]

"I have addressed Greer's situation with regard to holding his office. No charges have been brought against him. He was the legal and official office holder when this case was brought before the court. Because you disagree with the ruling doesn't make him any less rightful to hold the office. When an indictment is brought down, we can talk."

That in response to the question - yet again - asking if you've ever read the material about Greer you asked for, and were referred to.

You dare not answer that question. Everyone knows why.

[Wampus SC]

Who is the autor of the 2nd italicized paragraph in your #1338? You formatted it to make it appear that I am. No nevermind, false attribution is a tactic your kind is required to use.

That aside, please explain how that statement in the 2nd paragraph of your #1338 accuses you of being connected to moveon.org. It'd be really interesting to see how you arrived at that conclusion.

But you won't. Because you can't.

[defenderSD]

Bookmark bump.

[Wampus SC]

"Nope, I am not obsessed."

Good golly Miss Molly. I say you're not obsessed, and you reply with "Nope, I'm not obsessed". Attempting to disagree, you agree.

(Folks - remember that essay on the Twelve Steps of Troll Degeneration? One of the final stages in the deterioration was "argues with itself and loses both sides of the argument". I think this specimen sets a world record for reaching that stage so quickly.)

[Wampus SC]

"Murder is wrong. I have already disagreed with you as to whether this was murder. This was not murder. Try harder next time."

You couldn't have disagreed with me on that since I've never said to you that this was murder. Give a link to show us where I said that to you, or retract the statement. You will, unless you're too petty, weaselly and cowardly to admit a mistake, right?

I'm only doing this because I care about your confusion, and want to help you stop being so addled.

[Wampus SC]

"Because you disagree with the ruling doesn't make him any less rightful to hold the office."

SAL is right. It isn't the disagreement that does it. Being legally unqualified to hold the office is what does it. :)

[Wampus SC]

"And once again the screaming caplock key comes out."

I'm so glad you pointed that out, because capitalization and punctuation is really what this is all about...

[Wampus SC]

A koan for you, Grasshopper. If you set up and knock down ten strawmen in the forest and nobody hears it, what have you proved?

"Tell you what, why don't we agree to disagree? I'm not going to change your mind. You're not going to change mine."

Well, I can't speak for Sun, but speaking for myself I'm not here to try to change your mind. Merely to demonstrate you.

In the meantime, you must keep posting because others are posting. You are not allowed to stop. You have no choice. When in Rome, be a Brave, for your team...

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

"Being legally unqualified to hold the office is what does it."

It's no joke to me. I hold the entire baby-killing court system in contempt. They have usurped power, ignoring the very Constitution they are sworn to uphold. Do I give a rats' rear about what's legally qualified by an organized crime and shakedown operation?

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

Sandy Berglar will soon be 'legally qualified' to get security clearance again. The New Jersey Supreme Sandwich Court is 'legally qualified' to continue 'serving', despite their insange rulings. So is the 9th Circuis. They are all 'legally qualified' to spit on the Constitution. Yeah, like I care what's 'legally qualified'. The court system is raw sewage.

[floriduh voter]

I was standing right there too, when Barbara Waller came out of Terri's room. Well, I was sitting in a lawn chair and she was talking to media about Terri trying to say that she wanted to live. (but the cop guarding Terri from the hall said it was all untrue). Cops lied, Terri died.

[floriduh voter]

Barbara Weller, Esq.

[Sun]

"Nope. I made my own mind up about this. I don't listen to the MSM. My news consists of Hannity and Colmes, Sean Hannity's radio show, Fox News, Free Republic, Townhall.com, Drudge, Rushlimbaugh.com, Neal Boortz, etc. Those are hardly mainstream media. Look, I've accepted the fact that you disagree with me. Why don't you do likewise? We don't agree. There are greater tragedies in the world than disagreement."

Most of those people strongly supported Terri - STRONGLY.

Neal Bortz did not support Terri, but he's a jerk, who even puts down people who are against abortion.

[Sun]

"I was standing right there too, when Barbara Waller came out of Terri's room. Well, I was sitting in a lawn chair and she was talking to media about Terri trying to say that she wanted to live. (but the cop guarding Terri from the hall said it was all untrue). Cops lied, Terri died."

Besides Weller, and the cop, did anyone else hear Terri say that? It seems I read that her parents, and others heard it, too.

[SALChamps03]

Once again, calling me a liberal doesn't make me a liberal. I am not one. As I said, believe what you want pal.

[SALChamps03]

I said: I do not support nor have any connection to moveon.org"

You said in post 1330: No one said you did - so that's why you're denying it. Nothing if not consistent.

Therefore, I went and found a post where someone had accused me of being influenced by Moveon.org, and used it as evidence that someone had in fact said this. I did not say that you said it. In fact, after my citation, I replied, "They didn't, huh?" You will notice that I did not say "You didn't, huh?"

[SALChamps03]

For the record, I agree with you on abortion. I feel that abortion is a different circumstance than the TS case. Look, we have our different viewpoints. You feel more passionately than I do about her death. It was sad, untimely, and unfortunate. I just don't think it was murder. Let's leave it at that. I have revealed all of my views on this matter. I don't see any point in us taking it any farther. I have already conceded that you will never agree with me. That's OK. However, if you are going to continue until you get me to agree with your viewpoint, this is going to be one hell of a long thread, because I'm not going to agree with you. I think we should just leave it there.