To: cowboyway
Sharon Harris a little south of Raleigh has one reactor and was designed to handle 3. Put it there.
4 posted on
09/01/2005 1:16:36 PM PDT by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: Phantom Lord
Sharon Harris a little south of Raleigh has one reactor and was designed to handle 3. Put it there Actually, Harris is designed for 4 reactors. I worked there in the early 80's during construction.
Also, the last line in the article says, "Progress Chief Executive Robert McGehee said this year that Shearon Harris would be the likely site for the company's nuclear expansion."
15 posted on
09/01/2005 1:33:02 PM PDT by
cowboyway
(My heroes have always been cowboys.)
To: Phantom Lord
You mean it was designed to handle 3 more.
They won't be able to use any of the facilities that were supposed to be used by the other 3 reactors because of the changes they made during construction as they cancelled reactors. However they have a lot of land, and can build new buildings. The reservoirs can easily handle the extra load.
18 posted on
09/01/2005 1:34:43 PM PDT by
wolfpat
(The world is upside down when Snoop Dogg is selling cars.)
To: Phantom Lord
"Sharon Harris a little south of Raleigh has one reactor and was designed to handle 3. Put it there.
It would be a great idea because there is plenty of space in the OCA and Security has already been upgraded. It was actually built to handle 4 units, I think. It has spent fuel storage capacity for 4 units.
But sadly it probably won't happen, it's too close to Raleigh. Raleigh is growing in that direction.
58 posted on
09/06/2005 3:05:20 PM PDT by
WHBates
To: Phantom Lord
"Sharon Harris a little south of Raleigh has one reactor and was designed to handle 3 Actually, it's designed to handle 4.
My office used to be located in the area where Unit 4 would have been built.
62 posted on
09/06/2005 4:46:05 PM PDT by
Lloyd227
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson