Skip to comments.
Libertarians To Sue State (north carolina)
thepilot.com ^
| 9 1 05
| thepilot.com
Posted on 09/01/2005 4:54:43 PM PDT by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
2
posted on
09/01/2005 4:55:23 PM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
To: freepatriot32
“We’re tired of being treated like second-class citizens,” said Thomas Hill, state party chairman. Right.
Shouldn't they actually be third? Or is it fourth?
Dan
3
posted on
09/01/2005 4:55:51 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
"Shouldn't they actually be third? Or is it fourth?"
How christian of you.
4
posted on
09/01/2005 5:05:42 PM PDT
by
monday
To: freepatriot32
If the Libs (and other 3rd parties) wanted to accomplish something, they'd decide to agree on the ONE issue that matters. That issue is not being Dims or Pubbies.
The Taxpayers Party, the Constitution Party, the Libs, and several others could join forces, agree to disagree on stuff like drugs and porn, and make actual inroads against the major parties.
I see no problems with "coalition" governments. I vote with the GOP when that serves my principles, but will abandon them when it stops serving my principles. (That day is approaching FAST!)
5
posted on
09/01/2005 5:06:37 PM PDT
by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: freepatriot32
The legislature doesn't have to allow ballot access to every fly-by-night group that comes along. If they can't come up with the signatures, then it verifies they are insignificant.
That's why there are write-ins.
6
posted on
09/01/2005 5:25:22 PM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: freepatriot32
By definition, I guess most Libertarian parties aren't what I'd call "regimented". But, I tried to call them up in '04 and not only were they worthless, but their website was "under construction" every time I looked. In an election year!
I'm guessing competence had something to do with this.
To: freepatriot32
Get the signatures and there's no problem. 75,000 in a state of 8 million. Come on people.
8
posted on
09/01/2005 5:51:15 PM PDT
by
billybudd
To: monday
How christian of you.
Do Libertarians believe in a God? I know some of them believe in Pat Buchanan.
To: BibChr
Shouldn't they actually be third? Or is it fourth? Actually they should be first.... but most of them were too stoned to go sign the petitions.
To: BibChr
Given the track record of the last few years, anybody with an ounce of self-respect would be ashamed to be called a Republican.
Party of "limited government", my ass. Party of More Big Government.
11
posted on
09/01/2005 6:02:00 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Hank Rearden
Of the two viable actual participants, the GOP is clearly the better choice.
I outgrew the need to make hollow, self-referential gestures a good while ago.
Dan
12
posted on
09/01/2005 6:04:28 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: monday; Common Tator
I'm not seeing what Biblical doctrine calls on me to favor false prominence for the fringe party for drugs and hookers. You'll have to elucidate.
Dan
13
posted on
09/01/2005 6:06:37 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
Of the two viable actual participants, the GOP is clearly the better choice. I don't settle for the lesser of two evils - that's evil, because the "lesser" has exploded spending, deficits and government.
Apparently, that's what you want though.
14
posted on
09/01/2005 6:15:05 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Hank Rearden
News flash: EVERY party composed of sons of Adam is the greater or lesser of MULTIPLE evils.
You've chosen a self-serving gesture. It's about you.
There are only two parties that matter. I've chosen the better of the two viable contenders. It's about America.
Dan
15
posted on
09/01/2005 6:19:47 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: William Creel
Under Libertarian party principles, someone's 12 year old daughter would have the right to sell her body to a 70 year old man and use the profits of such a sale to purchase heroin or cocaine for herself.
Just what America needs /sarcasm
17
posted on
09/01/2005 6:53:53 PM PDT
by
Stepan12
To: freepatriot32
And they wonder why the other independents laugh at them.
18
posted on
09/01/2005 6:55:05 PM PDT
by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Idiots and the Internet don't mix, no matter how hard Michael Moore tries.)
To: freepatriot32
WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ON THE BALLOT!!!!!
OUR 1% SHOULD NOT HAVE TO WRITE OUR NAMES IN (if they can remember them, and are not too high, fried or stoned)
Pathetic losertarians.
19
posted on
09/01/2005 6:55:19 PM PDT
by
trubluolyguy
(Warning: Exposure to the SON may PREVENT burning.)
To: freepatriot32
13,000 is a lot of people. NC laws sound shady to me.
20
posted on
09/01/2005 8:16:12 PM PDT
by
rasblue
(Vive le libre Alberta!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson